I'd say perfect imperfection.dhamoeba wrote:brilliant work!![]()
perfect lighting, perfect textures!
how about render time?
Breakfast room ;)
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
the thing is, that in "real" life you can get away with some things you can't in archviz, you can create an out of scale chair and call it art http://www.flickr.com/photos/habitual/3 ... hotostream to try to create some wonder on the spectator, yet if you put that chair in the middle of a render everyone will call out it's scale. In archviz you have to out-do the reality and add more grim and dust that necesary just to fool the brain in believeing that what you see is real, in real life you try to unsettle the viewer with imposible cantilivers, out of scale objects and such...Refracty wrote:I Know that these bowls or plates are for fruits, decoration or something else. But they don't leave enough space for other things like plates, bowls to eat. Sorry, I am designer and have a keen eye on these things but still it is a very nice render and good work.
windows 7 x64 | 2xGTX570 (warming up the planet 1ºC at a time) | i7 920 | 12GB
Hi Kubo,
I think that there is only one rule applied to both worlds, cgi and reality, especially when today some renders hardly can't be differentiated from photography.
There are many cg artist who use the effect of 'crazy' proportions and scale to marvel the user.
A problem only occures when it is not a clear position. Lets say you just scale something a little bit bigger or smaller. Then the viewers eye will just be irritated and don't understand the 'joke'.
Maybe there is a deep artistic opinion behind like "People spend time and money in decorating their house but forget about the essentials of life like food and love."
If lets say this is the statement then I would scale the bowls even much bigger and call it brilliant.
I only try to help with ideas.
Ther rendering and especially the texturing is top notch. Don't get me wrong.
Thank you for the discussion.
Refracty
I think that there is only one rule applied to both worlds, cgi and reality, especially when today some renders hardly can't be differentiated from photography.
There are many cg artist who use the effect of 'crazy' proportions and scale to marvel the user.
A problem only occures when it is not a clear position. Lets say you just scale something a little bit bigger or smaller. Then the viewers eye will just be irritated and don't understand the 'joke'.
Maybe there is a deep artistic opinion behind like "People spend time and money in decorating their house but forget about the essentials of life like food and love."
If lets say this is the statement then I would scale the bowls even much bigger and call it brilliant.
I only try to help with ideas.
Ther rendering and especially the texturing is top notch. Don't get me wrong.
Thank you for the discussion.
Refracty
totally agree with you on both points, it's an awesome render, and for things to be "intentional" have to clearly be, either totally out of place, or way over scaled. The in-betweens create confusion. The thing is most people won't quite spot it, they might be unsettled but just don't know why, and the profesionals should be there to pinpoint what's lacking in the scene to make it perfect. At least in real life. Not an easy job btw.
Thankfully CG let's us try different ideas before are built and help a lot on the decision-making process. And when they are as good as this one, is almost as being there.
Thankfully CG let's us try different ideas before are built and help a lot on the decision-making process. And when they are as good as this one, is almost as being there.
windows 7 x64 | 2xGTX570 (warming up the planet 1ºC at a time) | i7 920 | 12GB
Yip, totally agree. Nothing to add 
