RTX 5080/5090
So RTX 5000 series has been revealed today. Do we have any info regarding what to expect in terms of Octane performance? I am pretty curious, if the speedup will be in-line with previous generations (2080Ti to 3090 to 4090), therefore almost 2x?
R9 7950x, 64GB DDR5 6000 MHz, 2x RTX 4090, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Kingston KC3000 2TB, Kingston KC3000 1TB, WD Caviar Gold 6TB, Win11 Pro 64bit
Sure, but at that point i might get one myself and find outZay wrote:If they work with the current OctaneBench, you will likely see the test results there when they become available.
But i guess i will just have to wait.
R9 7950x, 64GB DDR5 6000 MHz, 2x RTX 4090, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Kingston KC3000 2TB, Kingston KC3000 1TB, WD Caviar Gold 6TB, Win11 Pro 64bit
Hello. RTX 5090 should be... only ~1.35x faster than 4090 at... mainly path tracing kernel only on OR 2025.1 beta 2 despite no new OctaneBench. 
Best regards.
Best regards.
--Learns/tips before buy my image:
PT vs PHT kernels - spp nrs
Caustics at PT
TRUE spec materials w/ dispersion
//
NOTE: Sorry, my bad English for mute
//
i7-12700KF
32GB DDR4@3600
GF RTX 4090 <3
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"
PT vs PHT kernels - spp nrs
Caustics at PT
TRUE spec materials w/ dispersion
//
NOTE: Sorry, my bad English for mute
//
i7-12700KF
32GB DDR4@3600
GF RTX 4090 <3
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"
most likely, because the work is not yet done, to label it stable and somewhat final release - usually OB is updated after we het stable release, updated plugins and such.
Ok. Only 1.35x is very normal because 4nm process and 92-billion transistors for RTX 5090 aren't good enough.
--Learns/tips before buy my image:
PT vs PHT kernels - spp nrs
Caustics at PT
TRUE spec materials w/ dispersion
//
NOTE: Sorry, my bad English for mute
//
i7-12700KF
32GB DDR4@3600
GF RTX 4090 <3
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"
PT vs PHT kernels - spp nrs
Caustics at PT
TRUE spec materials w/ dispersion
//
NOTE: Sorry, my bad English for mute
//
i7-12700KF
32GB DDR4@3600
GF RTX 4090 <3
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"
