No benchmark for Titan X Pascal ?
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
We're waiting results due to bad optimization despite Pascal support. 
NOTE:OctaneBench doesn't work OR v3.00 but yes for OR v2.xx only.
NOTICE: Please you should delete your other 2 threads due to avoid spam.

NOTE:OctaneBench doesn't work OR v3.00 but yes for OR v2.xx only.
NOTICE: Please you should delete your other 2 threads due to avoid spam.

NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute 
i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3

SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"

Click "x" icon (delete) on top right of your message.atmos89 wrote:how to delete ? from where ...i can't find

NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute 
i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3

SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
NEW ViewSonic XG2431 24"

I just received two ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme cards yesterday with the intention of replacing my dual Titan X cards. Unfortunately, I didn't realize that the Zotak AMP Extreme is so gigantic -almost 13 inches long. I can only fit one in my case. I'll have to ebay the other and replace it with a shorter 1080 from another manufacturer. I ran the basic benchmark test in Lightwave this morning before leaving for the office. It rendered in 40 seconds (single card also serving as the monitor GPU). The AMP Extreme automatically clocked up to over 2000MHz during the render.
40 sec comparing to what result /GPUstkdoherty wrote:I ran the basic benchmark test in Lightwave this morning before leaving for the office. It rendered in 40 seconds (single card also serving as the monitor GPU). The AMP Extreme automatically clocked up to over 2000MHz during the render.

I's hardly any of use if you don't compare that same test to other card(s) in same machine/environment

--
Lewis
http://www.ram-studio.hr
Skype - lewis3d
ICQ - 7128177
WS AMD TRPro 3955WX, 256GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090, 1 * RTX 3090
RS1 i7 9800X, 64GB RAM, Win10, 3 * RTX 3090
RS2 i7 6850K, 64GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090
Lewis
http://www.ram-studio.hr
Skype - lewis3d
ICQ - 7128177
WS AMD TRPro 3955WX, 256GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090, 1 * RTX 3090
RS1 i7 9800X, 64GB RAM, Win10, 3 * RTX 3090
RS2 i7 6850K, 64GB RAM, Win10, 2 * RTX 4090
Here are a few benchmarks for the ZOTAK AMP! Extreme card. These were made using Octane Render 3.02 and the benchmark scene in Lightwave 3D rendered at 1280x720:
ASUS Titan X 12GB alone - 43 seconds
ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme alone (also being used for monitor displays) - 41 seconds
ASUS Titan X 12GB + ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme - 21 seconds
ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme + ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme - 20 seconds
The 1080 was slightly better. Hopefully when Octane is optimized for Pascal GPUs there will be significant rendering improvement.
ASUS Titan X 12GB alone - 43 seconds
ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme alone (also being used for monitor displays) - 41 seconds
ASUS Titan X 12GB + ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme - 21 seconds
ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme + ZOTAK 1080 AMP! Extreme - 20 seconds
The 1080 was slightly better. Hopefully when Octane is optimized for Pascal GPUs there will be significant rendering improvement.
Will we add the Titan X (pascal) as 'Titan XP' on the OctaneBench scorelist?
to make a difference with the ('older') Titan X already listed.
PS
What a strange choice of Nvidia choosing the same name, but we have to deal with that
to make a difference with the ('older') Titan X already listed.
PS
What a strange choice of Nvidia choosing the same name, but we have to deal with that

4090+3089ti & Quad 1080ti
ArchiCAD25, ofcourse Octane & OR-ArchiCAD plugin (love it)
http://www.tapperworks.com
http://www.facebook.com/pages/TAPPERWOR ... 9851341126
http://www.youtube.com/user/Tapperworks/videos