your works are great so is the snow.
Nuno, I missed you so much. Where have you been so long? I am jealous because I love you too

Hello friend!martincarlson wrote:If you want the snow - sign up here: http://octane4d.com/
And you will recieve info how to download when available!
Nuno: I love you!
I'm fake!?? No!! Any specular material with dispersion at real-life -> it's true! Because the factory can't remove dispersion in glasses or lens contact for eyes. Better glasses on world have major constringence (=less dispersion).sadece wrote:i believe that Nuno character is a fake of our minds since we all are spending lots of time in front of computers. Nuno does not exist indeed!
Hi friend!! I like you!smicha wrote:Nuno, I missed you so much. Where have you been so long? I am jealous because I love you too
AAH!! Sorry, I've OR standalone demo and OR plugin demo for 3ds max because I haven't C4D.nuno1980 wrote:I have sent you my email (rica*nun*@*.* -- «*» is letter(s)) hidden. I wait to download your scene about snow.martincarlson wrote:If you want the snow - sign up here: http://octane4d.com/
And you will recieve info how to download when available!
Here's for you Nuno! Your EXACT settings. Look better?nuno1980 wrote:NiceBut... no caustic!?
If you want real-life then should add dispersion 0.003 for ice stone. Therefore, you change ior from 1.309 to 1.299.
Any specular material must have dispersion.
Good luck.
something was missing from the render but i wasn't sure what. NOW it looks great, I'm glad Nuno helped you out with that!martincarlson wrote:Here's for you Nuno! Your EXACT settings. Look better?nuno1980 wrote:NiceBut... no caustic!?
If you want real-life then should add dispersion 0.003 for ice stone. Therefore, you change ior from 1.309 to 1.299.
Any specular material must have dispersion.
Good luck.
Ok But do you use path-tracing kernel?martincarlson wrote:Here's for you Nuno! Your EXACT settings. Look better?
martincarlson wrote:Of course nuno. PT. Wrong? PMC is better?
PMC is better and efficient for appear caustics. but this kernel is for the sun size with ~3x or less as the little area of lamp. Therefore, you don't need to use PMC and your image seems be true...martincarlson wrote:Of course nuno. PT. Wrong? PMC is better?