cheap fish eye lens on the thin lens camera

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.

For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar (Default)
itsallgoode9
Licensed Customer
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:04 am
Location: New York City
Contact:
Contact itsallgoode9

nuno1980 wrote:Pool -> no any caustics?! - but should use PMC kernel (32-maxdepth (both diffuse and specular), ~120k-sample/px, no "caustic blur", 2000 rejects, parallelism 1)

water material for pool:
-reflection 0.6
-transmission 0.99
-dispersion 0.004 (must enable dispersion due to the real life :))
-index of refraction 1.32

Better and more much realism render. :)
Some of these settings are so insanely ridiculous that I can't tell anymore if you are a real or just use the account to troll. If you're gonna spout your nonsense, at least recommend good/usable settings :roll:


Anyway, very cool technique for the renders!
Intel i7-3930K, 64gb RAM, Asus X79 Deluxe mobo, 2x EVGA 780 6gb (for rendering), 1x PNY quaddro k4000 (for display)
Windows 8.1 x64, Maya 2014, Octane Render v2
Top
User avatar
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm

itsallgoode9 wrote:Some of these settings are so insanely ridiculous that I can't tell anymore if you are a real or just use the account to troll. If you're gonna spout your nonsense, at least recommend good/usable settings :roll:


Anyway, very cool technique for the renders!
Insanely ridiculous!??!??!?!? No! :evil:

By examples:
- less than 50k-sample/px at resolution of 1002x602 -> noises, bad caustics,...;
- less than 10-maxdepth may cause more caustics missed than real-life despite outdoor,...
- less than ~2000 rejects - caustics less visible.


I use always PMC kernel with more than 32-maxdepth, 5- to 10k-reject, parallelism 1, average 150k-sample/px, no "caustic blur" and I have rendered during 2 to 15 hours. My images rendered look amazing and realism! :)
Last edited by nuno1980 on Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 19" Samtron 19" :|
Top
User avatar (Default)
mark0spasic
Licensed Customer
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 4:46 pm

nuno1980 wrote:
itsallgoode9 wrote:Some of these settings are so insanely ridiculous that I can't tell anymore if you are a real or just use the account to troll. If you're gonna spout your nonsense, at least recommend good/usable settings :roll:


Anyway, very cool technique for the renders!
Insanely ridiculous!??!??!?!? No! :evil:

By examples:
- less than 50k-sample/px at resolution of 1002x602 -> noises, bad caustics,...;
- less than 10-maxdepth may cause more caustics missed than real-life despite outdoor,...
- less than ~2000 rejects - caustics less visible.


I use always PMC kernel with more than 32-maxdepth, 5- to 10k-reject, parallelism 1, average 150k-sample/px, np "caustic blur" and I have rendered during 2 to 15 hours. My images rendered look amazing and realism! :)
Why don't you buy OCTANE RENDER? :idea:
We never saw your amazing and realistic renders. :lol:
And please don`t call people from this forum stupid. :roll:
AMD FX 6300, 24 GB RAM, Gigabyte ga-990fxa-ud5, 2x MSI GTX 780 3GB
Top
User avatar
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm

mark0spasic wrote:Why don't you buy OCTANE RENDER? :idea:
We never saw your amazing and realistic renders. :lol:
And please don`t call people from this forum stupid. :roll:
I'm waiting to buy OR until the date unknown due to crisis. :(
I'll upload here images soon but sorry for water marks. ;)
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 19" Samtron 19" :|
Top
User avatar
whersmy
Licensed Customer
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:40 am

Beppe, amazing shots! First few renders screamed photo, photooooooooo. I still find outdoor scenes with sun hard to render with that photorealistic feeling.

I would really like to see the non fish eye versions, is it possible to show them?
ciao
Octane 2022.1.1 nv535.98

x201t - gtx580 - egpu ec
Dell G5 - 16GB - dgpu GTX1060 - TB3 egpu @ 1060 / RTX 4090

Octane Render experiments - ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬
Top
User avatar (Default)
pegot
Licensed Customer
Posts: 934
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:44 am

These truly are great thanks for sharing the technique. The distortion very closely resembles what I get when shooting with my Sigma 8mm lens.
Win 10
3.7Ghz i9 10900k / 64GB
ASUS STRIX Z490-E
PSU: PowerSpec 850Wd
RTX 3090 Asus Tuff

Network rendering:
Win 10
4.2Ghz i7 7700k / 64GB
AsRock SuperCarrier
PSU: EVGA 1200w
RTX 3080 Ti EVGA Hybrid
RTX 3080 ASUS Tuff
GTX 1080ti SC Black (wc)
Top
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10328
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:
Contact bepeg4d

thanks all for the nice comments, i'll try to make a test with PMC for the pool shot, it definitively deserve some coustics ;)

@whersmy: at this link you can see a couple of videos, a vr tour and some shots, it's from 2010 so sorry for the quality.
at this other link you can see a 2013 sun animation test.
thanks for watching ;)
ciao beppe
Top
User avatar
resmas
Licensed Customer
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 10:44 pm
Location: Portugal
Contact:
Contact resmas

Really great mate.

Well done. ;)

its DL? the glass bricks are really great too.

cheers
resmas
i7-2600k | SSD Vertex 3 | WD Velociraptor | WS Revolution | 16GB Ram HyperX | PSU LEPA G1600W | 3 X Asus GTX590 |
https://pt-pt.facebook.com/arq.resmas
Top
User avatar
nuno1980
Licensed Customer
Posts: 783
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:04 pm

resmas wrote:Really great mate.

Well done. ;)

its DL? the glass bricks are really great too.

cheers
resmas
Ok. But... DL is bad because we see with attention the pool -> therefore, @bepeg4d should use PMC. ;)
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute ;)

i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3 :mrgreen:
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 19" Samtron 19" :|
Top
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10328
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:
Contact bepeg4d

Hi,
i have used the easter vacations for rendering the PMC version of the pool as promised, here is the result after 19h:52':24" for 16000 sampling:
Image
and here is the PT version with the same settings and sampling level but in 04h:23':37":
r-Fish-eye2-giano-PT-02n.jpg
and here is what happen under water in PMC:
underwater.jpg
Inspired by this discussion by martincarlson, i have not cleaned the fisheye before rendering :D
Image
and finally here is the clean version for for comparison:
r-Fish-eye2-giano-nodirt-01.jpg
@resmas: hi my friend :D all the renders are in PT, with the new GI clamp option i don't use DL Diffuse anymore ;)
ciao beppe

p.s. @admins: this discussion should be moved to the WIP section, sorry my mistake :oops:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”