It isn't true photorealism due to the lack of caustics!!!SusanEH wrote:look so realistic and smooth

It isn't true photorealism due to the lack of caustics!!!SusanEH wrote:look so realistic and smooth
Nuno if you can do it better show us. If not better shut up.nuno1980 wrote:It isn't true photorealism due to the lack of caustics!!!SusanEH wrote:look so realistic and smooth
nuno1980 wrote:It isn't true photorealism due to the lack of caustics!!!SusanEH wrote:look so realistic and smooth
Topitsallgoode9 wrote:nuno1980 wrote:It isn't true photorealism due to the lack of caustics!!!SusanEH wrote:look so realistic and smooth
" it isn't true photorealism because the model wasn't modeled using molecules"
FALSE!! Because your reason is "invented".itsallgoode9 wrote:" it isn't true photorealism because the model wasn't modeled using molecules"