AO kernel.
A classical bathroom
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
My last scene, modeled in MODO801, then exported to Octane and just a little bit of photoshop. I just love how finished are the images right out of Octane
AO kernel.
AO kernel.
AMD FX8350 8 cores. 16GBs RAM
GTX690
Win8 64.
GTX690
Win8 64.
I don't like these and rest your images because you do never use PT nor PMC kernel despite your GTX 690... 
NOTE: I'm sorry for bad english due to mute 
i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 19" Samtron 19"
i7-12700KF
2x16GB RAM@DDR4-3600
MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4
Zotac GF RTX 4090 <3
SSDs OCZ RD400 0.5TB and Crucial 2TB SATA3
HDD 1TB SATA2
LG BD-RE BH16NS40
PSU 1kW
CRT 19" Samtron 19"
I wouldn´t say those are bad images. Would you?
AMD FX8350 8 cores. 16GBs RAM
GTX690
Win8 64.
GTX690
Win8 64.
Hey nuno1980, reading your comments is very boring and annoying! Dont you have anything else to say than repeat constantly "Use PT, use PMC" and so on?nuno1980 wrote:I don't like these and rest your images because you do never use PT nor PMC kernel despite your GTX 690...
Please do us a favor and stop putting down other peoples work by repeating your phrases on and on!
The stuff PAQUITO shows works very well and a client on the Backend DONT CARES what kernel was used!
I've noticed a trend on this forum putting a lot of focus on what kernel was used and how many samples. These settings are important, but not nearly as relevant as artistic intent, materials used, lighting, quality of models…nuno1980 wrote:I don't like these and rest your images because you do never use PT nor PMC kernel despite your GTX 690...
It's not appropriate to put down people's work, no matter how you may feel about it. If you don't know how to phrase something in a positive and constructive way, remain silent.
Of course, we're all entitled to our opinions, but basic etiquette should apply when expressing them.
-
heartlessphil
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:23 am
I think he said that as a joke...we want him to make good use of that 690 tho!!! renders looks great anyway!
Jokes are supposed to be funnyheartlessphil wrote:I think he said that as a joke...we want him to make good use of that 690 tho!!! renders looks great anyway!
I really like these renders myself. My only critique would be to have some bump mapping or displacement on the tiles and floor. They look too smooth.
Other than that great job!
Other than that great job!
CPU: Intel I9-14900KF | Mobo: Asrock Z790 Tachi | Ram: 128gb | Storage: 64tb | GPU: 2x Asus ROG Strix - RTX3090 24gb
-
Seekerfinder
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:34 am
Paquito has shown on many occasions what is possible with DL. I am always impressed with the speed-quality ratio he achieves with this approach. DL is always good for iterative work, but if we can use it for production, so much the better.
Seeker
Seeker
Win 8(64) | P9X79-E WS | i7-3930K | 32GB | GTX Titan & GTX 780Ti | SketchUP | Revit | Beta tester for Revit & Sketchup plugins for Octane
I agree. It's all about the speed to quality ratio.Seekerfinder wrote:Paquito has shown on many occasions what is possible with DL. I am always impressed with the speed-quality ratio he achieves with this approach. DL is always good for iterative work, but if we can use it for production, so much the better.
Seeker
I use PT and pmc for my personal work when I have time for longer renders, but in a production environment fast turn-around is very important and time is a rare luxury. DL is often my goto kernel because it produces pleasing results very quickly. Clients don't care as long as the image looks good, and ultimately, they have the final say.
Of course, that's just my opinion and I could be wrong.