Interior renders

[PaulokaaDesign]

Hi everyone, this is my first activity on this forum. I've been using Octane for 2 months now, and I absolutely love it. I use 4 GTX Titans. It's time to share some of my projects.


Restaurant Diffuse 11 7 4




Panoramic view:
http://www.dermandar.com/p/eyZBOi/amber-tower

Panoramic view took about 13-14 hours to render. I can't find a way to speed it up.

Question: what software should I get to make higher quality panoramas? In .png file I can even see reflections of bar in wine glasses on the nearest table.
I tried Panoweaver, but it ruins the quality as well as Dermandar.


House interior Diffuse 7 6 4







Panoramic view:
http://www.dermandar.com/p/dWyuPQ/lublin-projekt-24-b

About 11 hours.

Again, the same situation with quality.


Apartment

For bedroom I used PMC 16, I just couln't achieve the proper effect on DL. Rendered in 15 minutes, it's still grainy but I didn't have time to let it finish.




And bathroom, Abbient Occlusion 11 6 4






It's very well illuminated, so it took about 40s for each render (1400x2000)

That's all for now, thanks

[Seekerfinder]

These are really good. Good use of light. And I love the panoramas!

Two observations:
1. Timber texture does no align in 2nd image;
2. WC / bidet low poly edges (are they Sketchup models?) - did you activate smooth on these materials in Octane?

What did you model in?

Also, as soon as you reach the 2 month stage you are obliged to put your hardware / software info in your signature. It helps others to see what you use to achieve your render speeds etc.

Best,
Seeker

[nuno1980]

Looks no 100% photorealistic except your image is rendered by PMC. Therefore, you must use PMC kernel with max depth 16 or 24, caustics blur 0.0 and parallelism 1 or 2 because your videocards are excellents and look glasses and/or mirrors to appear caustics.

[RobSteady]

Very nice!
What are the numbers behind the kernel types are standing for?
Bounces? Specular, glossy, diffuse?

[TRRazor]

Really nice quality there!
I don't know why but bathrooms always get me...so squeaky clean

[PaulokaaDesign]

WC / bidet low poly edges (are they Sketchup models?) - did you activate smooth on these materials in Octane?

No, these are not Sketchup models. I got it from producers. They are very poor but it's the time that counts im my job.

What did you model in?

Sketchup 2013

[Seekerfinder]

WC / bidet low poly edges (are they Sketchup models?) - did you activate smooth on these materials in Octane?

No, these are not Sketchup models. I got it from producers. They are very poor but it's the time that counts im my job.

What did you model in?

Sketchup 2013

Best,
Seeker

[/quote]

Thanks Paulo,
You're going to enjoy the new SketchUp plugin... And you'll be able to add rounded edges to crappy models like those with the new Octane 2.

Seeker

[jbsfender]

These are looking great, crazy the panoramas took so long on 4 titans! Can you tell us a bit more about your lighting set up for the first restaurant interiors? The lighting looks even and natural.

[nuno1980]

PLEASE should read my message (Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:48 pm) because you shouldn't render again your rest images PMC using yet. And I don't like too your images DL-AO using due to no photo-realistic!

[Seekerfinder]

PLEASE should read my message (Wed Apr 23, 2014 11:48 pm) because you shouldn't render again your rest images PMC using yet. And I don't like too your images DL-AO using due to no photo-realistic!

Hi Nuno,
I'm keen to hear what about the images you find non-photo realistic. Could you be more specific? I realize PMC should give Paulo better quality but these are pretty true. So, the question is, where do you see improvement needed or 'non-photo realism' and in which images?

Best,
Seeker