Blender 2.6RC
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
The release candidate for blender 2.6 is available to download from www.blender.org. Looks like the road to 2.6 is almost at an end.
(HW) Intel i7 2600k, 16GB DDR3, MSI 560GTX ti (2GB) x 3
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
Nice steady progress. I'll wait for the final release, though. 2.59 works fine.
I just noticed that the 2.61 release (Dec 2011) is supposed to already contain Cycles, huh?
I just noticed that the 2.61 release (Dec 2011) is supposed to already contain Cycles, huh?
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
cgmo.net
..and cycles supports instancing already.
But no directlight (only mesh emitters) yet.
So Octane is the more usable Renderer for me at the moment
Kind regards
Alain
But no directlight (only mesh emitters) yet.
So Octane is the more usable Renderer for me at the moment

Kind regards
Alain
Intel Pentium 2.8 GHz 2 Cores, 8 GB RAM, GeForce GTX Titan 8GB, Blender 2.72b, Win 7 64 Bit
While waiting for a faster animation system in Octane, Cycle may be interesting to render animated parts and composite them into the main image rendered in Octane.
I don't know if Cycle allows Shadows Caster and Shadow Catcher materials, but if it is the case, it will be imho a good complementary render.
This way we could benefit of the best quality and speed from Octane for the main part of the image and the easy animation from Blender with reasonable rendering time in Cycle.
I don't know if Cycle allows Shadows Caster and Shadow Catcher materials, but if it is the case, it will be imho a good complementary render.
This way we could benefit of the best quality and speed from Octane for the main part of the image and the easy animation from Blender with reasonable rendering time in Cycle.
French Blender user - CPU : intel Quad QX9650 at 3GHz - 8GB of RAM - Windows 7 Pro 64 bits. Display GPU : GeForce GTX 480 (2 Samsung 2443BW-1920x1600 monitors). External GPUs : two EVGA GTX 580 3GB in a Cubix GPU-Xpander Pro 2. NVidia Driver : 368.22.
- telemmaite
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:50 am
- Location: Sofia,Bulgaria
Im really starting to wonder about the speed of Octane when compared to Cycles.
This was rendered in exactly 24min with Pathtracing in Cycles... I will not get similar result in Octane even after 1hour and using PMC+portals.
Maybe im doing something very wrong but i doubt it. I also tried some Cornell boxes Octane vs Cycles ...and man the speed hurts!
This was rendered in exactly 24min with Pathtracing in Cycles... I will not get similar result in Octane even after 1hour and using PMC+portals.
Maybe im doing something very wrong but i doubt it. I also tried some Cornell boxes Octane vs Cycles ...and man the speed hurts!
i5 2500K 4.7Ghz | Ram 4GB 1600mhz Kingston | Palit GTX 470 | Win7 64x | Octane with Blender 2.59