UE4 looks prettty impressive in this test. I for one have a very hard time using Path tracing or PMC for animations anyway. I have a sinlge Titan GPU. Even with 2 Titans i doubt i would use path tracing. I always use direct light as does UE4. In this video they rendered on octane with 2500 passes DL 7min per frame and UE4 is real time. I think octane looks better but by how much? What do you think? Pretty impressive for a real time render i must say.
https://vimeo.com/93246664
Octane vs UE4
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
It is impressive, and has a definite use case alongside OR. We're big fans of Epic and UE4. This is one reason we're building the UE4/Octane/Brigade plug-in (announced at Siggraph). The goal is for you to export to UE4 in ORBX format, and potentially also leverage OctaneRender/Brigade in place of lightmass.
-
Seekerfinder
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:34 am
Very excited about this!Goldorak wrote:It is impressive, and has a definite use case alongside OR. We're big fans of Epic and UE4. This is one reason we're building the UE4/Octane/Brigade plug-in (announced at Siggraph). The goal is for you to export to UE4 in ORBX format, and potentially also leverage OctaneRender/Brigade in place of lightmass.
Seeker
Win 8(64) | P9X79-E WS | i7-3930K | 32GB | GTX Titan & GTX 780Ti | SketchUP | Revit | Beta tester for Revit & Sketchup plugins for Octane