It 's only two days I use octane, but already I love it
export Sketchup - Octane
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Hi Guys ... sorry for my english ... I did several tests to export from sketchup to octane and better results for the textures and patterns I got them as attached pictures. We also send a little test done with these settings.
It 's only two days I use octane, but already I love it
It 's only two days I use octane, but already I love it
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40 GHz, 3GB Ram, Windows XP 32 Bit
hi,
I'm an architect, not a rendering expert, and I only use a really small percent of the octane software features but the results are comparatively high in respect to other software I've tested before.
the only thing I really need badly is the glass shadows mapping.
that's the sketchup OBJ export way that I've set down after some different tryouts.
the original sketchup model is quite rich of geometry and texture but it work fine.
at only 1.3ms/s, in texture envirronment, it take 30 minutes.
bye....
andrea
Win 7 Prof | Quadro FX 3700M PCI/SSE2 RAM 1024mb driver version 197.16 CUDA 3.0 loaded |core intel duo 9600 2.80 ghz |ram 4GB
I'm an architect, not a rendering expert, and I only use a really small percent of the octane software features but the results are comparatively high in respect to other software I've tested before.
the only thing I really need badly is the glass shadows mapping.
that's the sketchup OBJ export way that I've set down after some different tryouts.
the original sketchup model is quite rich of geometry and texture but it work fine.
at only 1.3ms/s, in texture envirronment, it take 30 minutes.
bye....
andrea
Win 7 Prof | Quadro FX 3700M PCI/SSE2 RAM 1024mb driver version 197.16 CUDA 3.0 loaded |core intel duo 9600 2.80 ghz |ram 4GB
MSi GE75 Raider 8SF - W10PRO - RTX 2070 8GB mobile
thank's radiance,
I know from other post in the forums that your staff is working hard on that issue.
is it difficult to put a 'memory' button of the last few inputs, giving the opportunity to explore different setup of the scene and easily come back to the original one?
I'm impressed by your realtime answer on all the forums.
best regards,
andrea
Win 7 Prof | Quadro FX 3700M PCI/SSE2 RAM 1024mb driver version 197.16 CUDA 3.0 loaded |core intel duo 9600 2.80 ghz |ram 4GB
I know from other post in the forums that your staff is working hard on that issue.
is it difficult to put a 'memory' button of the last few inputs, giving the opportunity to explore different setup of the scene and easily come back to the original one?
I'm impressed by your realtime answer on all the forums.
best regards,
andrea
Win 7 Prof | Quadro FX 3700M PCI/SSE2 RAM 1024mb driver version 197.16 CUDA 3.0 loaded |core intel duo 9600 2.80 ghz |ram 4GB
MSi GE75 Raider 8SF - W10PRO - RTX 2070 8GB mobile
We're working on a more generalized system that can handle this, coming in the next version.andrear wrote:thank's radiance,
I know from other post in the forums that your staff is working hard on that issue.
is it difficult to put a 'memory' button of the last few inputs, giving the opportunity to explore different setup of the scene and easily come back to the original one?
I'm impressed by your realtime answer on all the forums.
best regards,
andrea
Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
