Rendering Comparison to catch "deadline"

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.

For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar (Default)
AndreaMannori
Licensed Customer
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:25 am
Location: Bergamo

ROUBAL wrote:Direct lighting gives poor results when you have transparent glossy materials.

The best result is imho when compositing a Pathtracing render and a Direct lighting render. Obviously it takes longer, but you get both advantages of the AO and good transparencies.
Please, can you explain better how to composite two different methods? Do you mean DL->AO (aka clay render) multiplied by PT render? Or do you mean a complete DL-lighten- PT ?
Thank you in advance!
Andrea Mannori

win 8.1 x64; nvidia 770M driver 340.52; octane standalone 2 + c4doctane 2.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”