Acquiring caustics

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
User avatar
t_3
Posts: 2871
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:37 pm

well, there is no bidirectional pathtracing in octane - yet - what of course currently limits the possibilities.
but if i raise iso or exposure a little, you can see that the shadows are of course tinted by the refracted light.

regarding that thea images: as this seem to be tubes, they should not create caustics like a solid body?
Attachments
cst2.jpg
The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply

1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
KierovNick
Licensed Customer
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:19 pm

Yes, you are correct. They should not give caustics like a solid body and it does not (there are differences in KT between hollow and full cylinders)
My guess that outcome is depandant on more than one factor, and that Octane, as unbiased engine, does caustics better.

I tried to mess a bit with IOR in KT you can see the results below, and when comparing it to Octane... Octane does way better job. I am not sure why KT works like this, but at this point it becomes irrelevant, as since caustics are being calculated nicely in Octane, and i intend to buy Octane licence... well.. that's a good bye for KT.
Attachments
Index of Refraction differences in Kerkythea.
Index of Refraction differences in Kerkythea.
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”