hello,
i usually render interior scenes.
i notice that when i don't put a celling on my scene , the scene renders much faster and far more better, the final results are more accurate color wise.
THIS are few images , the 2 LAST are with celling and emitters lights and the 2 FIRST are with no celling and no emitter lights at all.
can i get the same results with some emitter light technique ??
THANKS
any way for lightinig my scene
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Good work,
you could improve it by adding stronger light sources or daylight.
Now the lighting looks a bit flat like outdoor with coluds.
But the texturing and details are really nice.
Well done.
you could improve it by adding stronger light sources or daylight.
Now the lighting looks a bit flat like outdoor with coluds.
But the texturing and details are really nice.
Well done.
Thanks, but I don't know if I made my point ?
Im trying to find a technique to light interior scenes more officiant .
It is obvious that the 2 first images are better in every terms, although I used the same materials.
I realized that when I don't use a calling, the environmental light, lights better the scene and much more faster, but that is not always possible ( no ceiling ) .
Can anyone suggest some way to make the same results (as the two first images) or just about the same ?
And yes I get allot of flat images , just if the photos where taken in a cold day and whith clouds, I tried to use images as backgrounds but I get strange results ( photos don't give enough light and if I increase the gamma I get a fade out image for background)
Please any suggestions
Thanks.
Im trying to find a technique to light interior scenes more officiant .
It is obvious that the 2 first images are better in every terms, although I used the same materials.
I realized that when I don't use a calling, the environmental light, lights better the scene and much more faster, but that is not always possible ( no ceiling ) .
Can anyone suggest some way to make the same results (as the two first images) or just about the same ?
And yes I get allot of flat images , just if the photos where taken in a cold day and whith clouds, I tried to use images as backgrounds but I get strange results ( photos don't give enough light and if I increase the gamma I get a fade out image for background)
Please any suggestions
Thanks.
CPU: INTEL i7 3.40 GHz/RAM: 8 GB/GPU: 2XGTX690/OS: WIN 7 64 BIT/SKETCHUP 2014/OCTANE for SU
-
MaTtY631990
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 8:38 pm
Nice images 
. How many windows do have to let environment light into scene.
. How many windows do have to let environment light into scene.That is a bit confusing. No cealling means open space above. No windows means closed wall.manos wrote:No windows , no cealling at all
I think you should zoom out to show about the environment and building openings/emitters.
Then we might help you better.
this is it.
by the way i'm not using nodes, is there a tutorial about them ?
in the octanes manual there is only a small reference about nodes.
i don't know what are the benefits of working with nodes and i would like to learn more about them.
i only use them for ies lights (texture emitters).
by the way i'm not using nodes, is there a tutorial about them ?
in the octanes manual there is only a small reference about nodes.
i don't know what are the benefits of working with nodes and i would like to learn more about them.
i only use them for ies lights (texture emitters).
- Attachments
-
CPU: INTEL i7 3.40 GHz/RAM: 8 GB/GPU: 2XGTX690/OS: WIN 7 64 BIT/SKETCHUP 2014/OCTANE for SU
I see. I think you should really go back and restore the surrounding. You should integrate windows or emitters.
You could try to use portals to speed up rendertime with the ceiling ontop. Or try to remove one wall only.
You could try to use portals to speed up rendertime with the ceiling ontop. Or try to remove one wall only.
-
telemmaite
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:50 am
- Location: Sofia,Bulgaria
Pathtracing algorithms are always working best with open environments because the rays are shot from the camera and try to find the light sources. The more open space the easier it is to find a light source. However as this is unbiased photo-realistic render you will get far from realistic renders by using this technic.
i5 2500K 4.7Ghz | Ram 4GB 1600mhz Kingston | Palit GTX 470 | Win7 64x | Octane with Blender 2.59