For some reason, the cores in the 560 do not perform as well as the cores in a 570 or 580. It seems that it might have something to do with the architecture of the chip.SurfingAlien wrote:is it not too much compared to Silverwing's 570 above?
480cores*168s/384cores = 210 -> should I expect 3:30 mins then?
OCTANE BENCHMARK: Submit performance scores for your rig!
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
to me it seems like the interface width (256 bits for x60 cards, 320 bits for x70 cards and 384 bits for x80 cards) is the factor that leads to this, because ram bandwidth is a clear factor in rendering performance; just have a look here http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... f=9&t=7383GeoPappas wrote:For some reason, the cores in the 560 do not perform as well as the cores in a 570 or 580. It seems that it might have something to do with the architecture of the chip.SurfingAlien wrote:is it not too much compared to Silverwing's 570 above?
480cores*168s/384cores = 210 -> should I expect 3:30 mins then?
„The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply ‟
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
22.64 Ms/sec (pathtracing)
3 * GTX 590 + 1 * GTX 580 (3GB)
3 * GTX 590 + 1 * GTX 580 (3GB)
- tehfailsafe
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:27 pm
Holy crap! Wish I woulda volunteered for that moderator job now...Refracty wrote:22.64 Ms/sec (pathtracing)
3 * GTX 590 + 1 * GTX 580 (3GB)

windows 7 64 bit| GTX580 1.5Gb x2 | Intel 2600k @ 4.9 | 16gb ddr3 | 3ds max 2012
I know this was to be rendered with an old version of octane, but I thought it would just be interesting to put of the stats on my gtx560ti - 7.3ms/sec
Thats faster than the gtx590 on the old octane! good job with the render engine refractive!:D

... well it's even faster than a gtx 590 in the latest octane version. are you sure you did use pathtracing?Sixthlaw wrote:I know this was to be rendered with an old version of octane, but I thought it would just be interesting to put of the stats on my gtx560ti - 7.3ms/secThats faster than the gtx590 on the old octane! good job with the render engine refractive!:D

„The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply ‟
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400