Why is there no "Real Time Rendering" in the plugins

[funk]

Amaterasu, can you send this scene to Otoy for compare ?

166 seconds vs 194 seconds is exactly 25% if nothing has changed in recent years.

I'm confused how you are getting 25% from these 2 render times. Can you explain your formula?

perc.jpg

But that's not how you calculate a speed percentage increase/decrease. And the "85%" in your screenshot is not the "25%" you mentioned in your post.

[SSmolak]

But that's not how you calculate a speed percentage increase/decrease. And the "85%" in your screenshot is not the "25%" you mentioned in your post.

It is 25% less (166sec ) from 100% ( 194sec ).

[funk]

But that's not how you calculate a speed percentage increase/decrease. And the "85%" in your screenshot is not the "25%" you mentioned in your post.

It is 25% less (166sec ) from 100% ( 194sec ).

Do you mean 15%? (100 - 85 = 15)

[SSmolak]

But that's not how you calculate a speed percentage increase/decrease. And the "85%" in your screenshot is not the "25%" you mentioned in your post.

It is 25% less (166sec ) from 100% ( 194sec ).

Do you mean 15%? (100 - 85 = 15)

Ha yes sorry 15% But it is still too much in my opinion if we compare plugin to standalone.

[funk]

Do you mean 15%? (100 - 85 = 15)

Ha yes sorry 15% But it is still too much in my opinion if we compare plugin to standalone.

Hey no worries. Math isn't my strong point either. 15% is closer to the values I posted as well.

I think something else must be different between the C4D render and the ORBX Standalone is rendering. eg. The plugin may be exporting some ORBX values incorrectly, which render faster

[funk]

In fact, if you take Amaterasu's images and try to line them up in photoshop, they don't line up.

I don't know if its just bad cropping on the sample images, but it looks like different camera positions (or frames), which would mean the test results are flawed.