mikeadamwood wrote:Thanks for the advice buddy!
I will be gaming on it occasionally, don't want to rule it out.
I'm confused at the slower clock speed to more cores..Is it best to have say a 3.5ghz 6core as opposed to a 4.0ghz Quad core, what makes the most difference in rendering? Pretty sure C4D and most CPU renderers only use one core? Correct me if I'm wrong.
Cheers.
Hi,
It seems it is not so obvious to determine the optimal hardware for OctaneRender when looking at the CPU.
What would be better CPU config for Octane user?
a dual Xeon versus a single i7?
i7 cores have higher frequency.
According to Paul (face_off) "the plugin will extract all the geometry from ArchiCAD in a single thread, load that info into Octane in a single thread, but then Voxelize the data using multiple threads."
So, for that one thread an i7 core can be more interesting then two Xeons.
but xeon can have a dual cpu and many more threads for other tasks that has to be done.
And ofcours your 3d-modelling software may or may not make use of multithreading and therefor xeons versus i7 can be placed in different perspective.
For me as an ArchiCAD user it is important to have a high single core clockspeed, because for important tasks in ArchiCAD it is single core only.
When we are talking about optimal hardware config it is different for slaves.
According to Paul "The slave is being sent the Octane NodeGraph - so yes, a lot of the hard work has already been done."
For those who want to see more (replies)... A while ago started a thread like this in ArchiCAD forum:
viewtopic.php?f=56&t=56127
the link to the this post (link above) shows images of threads used while doing calculations.. might be interesting to read. You find one image here too.
Cheers,