GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Post, discuss and share handy resources like textures, models and HDRI maps in this forum.
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
Locked
User avatar (Default)
buda
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: Ukraine

Zay wrote:Just got my Gainward 470 and did some tests.
Driver 197.75, Octane render 1.022, Vista 64bit
2,67 Megasamples.
O/C 3.33 Megasamples.
Cool )) How GPU temperature? ?
cuda
Top
User avatar (Default)
Zay
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1123
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:53 am

Below 70C. The fans was set manually to run at full speed. At default fan speed Octane would crash.
Win 11 Pro | i5 12600K | 32GB ram | 2x GTX 1080Ti + 3080Ti - studio driver 560.94| Modo/Blender/ZBrush/Daz/Poser
Top
User avatar (Default)
buda
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: Ukraine

Zay wrote:Below 70C. The fans was set manually to run at full speed. At default fan speed Octane would crash.
full speed? She makes a noise louder than a vacuum cleaner. )))))
Last edited by buda on Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
cuda
Top
User avatar (Default)
crazyhorse666
Licensed Customer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:49 am

portable 280m chipset seems very fast compared to desktop gtx470 how can this be right ?

Crazy
Attachments
benchmark 280M.jpg
portable clevo 900f/i7920/6gb/nvidiagtx280M/win7 beta 1.022b
Top
User avatar (Default)
crazyhorse666
Licensed Customer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:49 am

ok sorry i hit pathtracing and ran the benchmark again
benchmark 280M pathtrace.jpg
0.57mpixs /sec !

my rig is a portable clevo i7 920 6gb with a nvidia gt280m chipset
portable clevo 900f/i7920/6gb/nvidiagtx280M/win7 beta 1.022b
Top
User avatar (Default)
goranmax
Licensed Customer
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:09 am

Capture.jpg
HI all

I have tested my GTX 480 with water cooling

here is the result. still do not get it

is that good?
Attachments
Capture.jpg
Last edited by goranmax on Sun Jul 25, 2010 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Windows 7 64bit || 12GB Ram || Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU || GeForce GTX 480 with Water Cooling
Top
User avatar (Default)
buda
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: Ukraine

goranmax wrote:HI all

I have tested my GTX 480 with water cooling

here is the result. still do not get it

is that good?
Swith to pathtrase mode...
cuda
Top
User avatar (Default)
realTimer
Licensed Customer
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:40 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:
Contact realTimer

Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB, factory OC @ 715MHz
This is the new GF104 with superscalar architecture, but only 224 of the 336 cores are used according to the device manager.
The result is 1.82 Megapixels/sec with Octane Render 1.022b
Attachments
Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB, factory OC @ 715MHz
Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB, factory OC @ 715MHz
Gigabyte GTX460 1GB @ 715MHz | Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 4GB DDR2 | WinXP 32-bit
Top
User avatar (Default)
goranmax
Licensed Customer
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:09 am

buda wrote:
goranmax wrote:

Swith to pathtrase mode...
but please tell me is that good or not

high numbers good ?...low numbers bad...or ???
Windows 7 64bit || 12GB Ram || Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU || GeForce GTX 480 with Water Cooling
Top
User avatar (Default)
realTimer
Licensed Customer
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:40 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:
Contact realTimer

goranmax wrote: but please tell me is that good or not

high numbers good ?...low numbers bad...or ???
High numbers are good :)
Gigabyte GTX460 1GB @ 715MHz | Q9550 @ 2.83GHz | 4GB DDR2 | WinXP 32-bit
Top
Locked

Return to “Resources and Sharing”