well , Image is perfect but )) your time 50 hour ruins all my expectations towards octane
why this took so long time...? I understand 8000x4000 is a big image but what if 1920x1080 (( in 50hrs this could be done with renderman or vray or
with corona maybe even 10 times faster
"52Hz" / Octane 3.0 Scene
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
-
andrey.krivulya
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 6:15 pm
- Contact:
Amazing stuff! Very cool work! I'm impressed! Congrats!
win 10 /64x Intel Core i9-11980HK - 64Gb RAM - 3080 Laptop - 16Gb VRAM - AERO 15 OLED YD
My youtube channel with 3d tutorials ----- >>>> https://www.youtube.com/c/AndrewKrivulya
My youtube channel with 3d tutorials ----- >>>> https://www.youtube.com/c/AndrewKrivulya
-
blobbybarack
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 9:11 pm
- Location: Paris
- Contact:
Super rad
-
Elvissuperstar007
- Posts: 2506
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
- Location: Ukraine/Russia
- Contact:
WalterSulivan wrote:well , Image is perfect but )) your time 50 hour ruins all my expectations towards octane
why this took so long time...? I understand 8000x4000 is a big image but what if 1920x1080 (( in 50hrs this could be done with renderman or vray or
with corona maybe even 10 times faster
one frame in the animation took 5 minutes and 40 hours was rendered version with fog in the resolution of 8K, I would not be so sure. that the crown or rendermen fog will render faster
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
all the engines you name are biased (or have both biased and unbiased options.WalterSulivan wrote:well , Image is perfect but )) your time 50 hour ruins all my expectations towards octane
why this took so long time...? I understand 8000x4000 is a big image but what if 1920x1080 (( in 50hrs this could be done with renderman or vray or
with corona maybe even 10 times faster
octane is a pathtracer (unbiased), if you want to compare it to vray you'd compare it to fog rendered in BR/BR and no interpolation at all.
I doubt that there's any cpu based pathtracer that could render real volumetric fog faster.
it simply is the fog.... fog does take very long.
Windows 10 | 1x 4090, 4x 3090 | 13900K | 128Gb