My feature suggestion

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Post Reply
vgd
Licensed Customer
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:35 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

- Tree object palette with ghost/unghost feature and layers
- Group, ungroup, join, unjoin objects
- Translate, rotate, scale objects with manipulator
- More mapping: cube, planar, spherical, cylindrical, frontal
- Translate, rotate and scale texture with manipulator
- Alpha channel render
- ID material and objects render
- Istances
- Clone/duplicate objects
- Multi labels materials over the objects with manipulator
- Reactive bump/displace with texture or paint over object
- Basic objects: cube, plane, sphere, ecc.
- Progressive save image during render process (user chose time lapse)
- Save render status for resume
- Material database and material wizard
- Save and load materials
- Emitter mesh and IES
havensole
Licensed Customer
Posts: 463
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:31 pm
Location: Rialto, CA USA
Contact:

If you took a look at many of the other feature request and such you would find that most, if not all of these, have already been brought up or dealt with. A lot of them are on the future list of features to come, but many things need to come first.
System 1: EVGA gtx470 1280Mb and MSI gtx470 1280 in Cubix Xpander for Octane, AMD 945, 4Gb Ram
All systems are at stock speeds and settings.
User avatar
Nichod
Licensed Customer
Posts: 49
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 2:40 pm

I think a feature request thread would be a nice idea. Just keep them in one area for refractive to deal with. Rather than all these scattered posts.
Windows 7 64bit | AMD Phenom 9550 | 6 gigs ram | Blender, Silo, messiah 4.5 |
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

hi guys,

we do keep track of these on a general term, one thing to remember is that we have a set roadmap for v1.0.
we all want the basics first, area lights etc...

suggesting features that depend on other foundations that depend on other foundations that haven't been implemented is ok,
but if you keep doing it it can get a bit frustrating...
just try to coordinate your efforts a bit and keep things centralized, and hopefully a bit unique.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”