OctaneRender™ Standalone 2.10

[smicha]

PathTracing 35 ms/s on titan+3x780

[glimpse]

Thanks, OTOY for this release! =)
Great Update! (as always, Guys)

[aoktar]

In my tests, i have see that ms/s is not only factor. Also this version works much better on many emissions. Better sampling on lights.

[smicha]

I hope I didn't f..p something but I got 40ms/s vs 27ms on PathTracing (titan+one gtx 780), reducing diffuse depth in 2.1 and 2.06 respectively.

This is 48% improvement ???

Guys correct me if I am wrong.

[aoktar]

I hope I didn't f..p something but I got 40ms/s vs 27ms on PathTracing, reducing diffuse depth in 2.1 and 2.06 respectively.

This is 48% improvement ???

Guys correct me if I am wrong.

We did lot of tests since weeks. Yes correct, you can see %100 improvements on some scenerios

[cfrank78]

I hope I didn't f..p something but I got 40ms/s vs 27ms on PathTracing (titan+one gtx 780), reducing diffuse depth in 2.1 and 2.06 respectively.

This is 48% improvement ???

Guys correct me if I am wrong.

It depends on some factors. What lights are you using, what materials and so on. Its hard to explain when what works or to be honest i have not found out all too and i test it since weeks. Experiment and you will see. At least its a hell of a lot faster than before in most szenes and this ROCKS.

[smicha]

Guys,

Give us some tutorials on render passes.

[aoktar]

Sorry aoktar,
I am so excited I cannot read

Yes, this is same behaviour as we saw first tests. I think this version cleans the noises much better than old's. I'll let out my plugin asap to see people.

[smicha]

Path termination power strongly affects the speed of PT (21 vs 36ms/s ms for 0 and 1 respectively on my scene) which is a massive difference, 71%.
I just need to play with it more...

[smicha]

Just playing with scripted graph - the script that Marcus wrote returns "script did not return a table". Am I doing something wrong?

the script is at
http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=73&t=41388