Speedcomparison maxwell

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.

For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar (Default)
Feniks
Licensed Customer
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:56 pm

did a comparisontest with maxwell :
Must say, i'm quite impressed at this resolution, however for final rendering which was about 9000x9000 pixels
Maxwell won for final output. The endvisual wich contained some millions of polys watersplashes in the form of a hand
couldnt be rendered with octane due lack of memory on the videocards. I'll post a final image when it's released.

Image
Windows 7 64bit | 2x X5680@3333Mhz | 24GB | 2x Quadro FX3800
Top
User avatar (Default)
vanlicht
Licensed Customer
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 8:19 am
Location: Los Angeles

Nice picture!
It is nice to see someone doing comparison.
I wonder though, what if it's done with GTX480 *2,
since it got more VRAM and it is a newer architecture than FX3800.
Windows 7 64bit | Maya 2010 64 bit (main) | Maya 2011 | Intel i7-920 | Nvidia Quadro FX1800 | Nvidia GTX480
Top
User avatar (Default)
Krisonrik
Licensed Customer
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:51 pm

vanlicht wrote:Nice picture!
It is nice to see someone doing comparison.
I wonder though, what if it's done with GTX480 *2,
since it got more VRAM and it is a newer architecture than FX3800.
I doubt any video card on the market can handle a 9k resolution film. It's 154 times larger than the 1024x512 standard resolution Octane uses. Maybe a tesla C1060 or a FX5800 could... but who knows.
Dual Lindenhurst single core Xeon 3.6Ghz with Hyperthreads, 8GB DDR-2 ECC, Geforce GTX 260
Dual Xeon 5680 3.2Ghz with Hyperthreads, 24GB DDR-3 ECC, Quadro 4800 & GTX 480
Top
User avatar (Default)
e3di
Licensed Customer
Posts: 70
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:49 pm

I have rendered a 9000x9000 image using a tesla C1060...
Top
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

cool ;) that would make approx 1 minute with GTX480's ;)

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
Top
User avatar (Default)
Krisonrik
Licensed Customer
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:51 pm

e3di wrote:I have rendered a 9000x9000 image using a tesla C1060...
Wow, would you say C1060 is worthwhile? Right now it's around $1100. And for pure RAM aspect, it's not that bad. But it's last gen GPU. But the C2070 that's not out yet is positioned at $4k... man that's a little bit hard to justify. How much RAM did it take you to render that 9k square image?
Dual Lindenhurst single core Xeon 3.6Ghz with Hyperthreads, 8GB DDR-2 ECC, Geforce GTX 260
Dual Xeon 5680 3.2Ghz with Hyperthreads, 24GB DDR-3 ECC, Quadro 4800 & GTX 480
Top
User avatar
justix
Licensed Customer
Posts: 585
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:01 pm

radiance wrote:cool ;) that would make approx 1 minute with GTX480's ;)

Radiance
2X ??

and to go back to my last post in the gallery It would be nice to get these sort of scene to compare and troubleshooting Videocards.....I need an optimization
Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
Top
User avatar (Default)
9fly
Licensed Customer
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:13 am

@Feniks

Could you make other test with some complex scenes like interior please. Thank you for your time
Top
User avatar
Amplitude
Licensed Customer
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat May 01, 2010 1:10 pm
Location: Bordeaux, France
Contact:
Contact Amplitude

I have rendered a 9000x9000 image using a tesla C1060...
that's interesting, do you mean that with your tesla Octane accepts to render above the 4096x4096 "wall" ?
Win7 Pro x64 | GTX 770 2GB + GTS250 512Mb | Intel Xeon i7 4x 3.4ghz | 16 GB ECC Mem | Intel SSD 520 | Dell 27"
SOFTIMAGE l 2011 + OCTANE V1.20
Top
User avatar (Default)
Feniks
Licensed Customer
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 5:56 pm

@9fly, if you send me a setupped scene with the right maxwell materials, I can run the test for you.
Windows 7 64bit | 2x X5680@3333Mhz | 24GB | 2x Quadro FX3800
Top
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”