GTX470 benchmarks / comparison
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
I'd be very surprised if anyone released a GTX 480 with 6 GB; there just aren't any games that could take advantage of that much memory, which means the potential market (basically all of us here!) is very small. I think the best we might see is a 480 with 3 GB, hopefully later this year. Or you could pick up a Tesla C2070 when it's released, but I think most of us have better ways to spend a few thousand dollars.
they are the same scene / same settings and they look equal to me...tforgo wrote:Last two images posted with optimized fermi octane appear to be darker in shadows and have less reflection on materials. Could it suggest that there is less light bounces calculated?
Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
Hello!
Here are my results on my GTX275 1792 MB Gigabyte HDMI stock clocks with Q6600 @ 2,4 GHz , 8 GB ram A-Data DDR2 800 MHz, MSI P35 using hackintosh OSX 10.6.3
. Octane render 1.021 beta 2.1 demo .

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Here are my results on my GTX275 1792 MB Gigabyte HDMI stock clocks with Q6600 @ 2,4 GHz , 8 GB ram A-Data DDR2 800 MHz, MSI P35 using hackintosh OSX 10.6.3


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
tforgo asked me about doing a comparison with the new optimized version, so I rendered the benchmark all the way through again. I have attached the images from my last benchmark render that was to the finish and the new 1.21 beta. I didn't think I would see any difference, but when I switched between the two images, I could see the new render is just slightly darker than the original render.tforgo wrote:Last two images posted with optimized fermi octane appear to be darker in shadows and have less reflection on materials. Could it suggest that there is less light bounces calculated?
The original render is on the bottom, new render on the top.
Windows 7 64-bit | GTX 470 | i7 920 | 12 GB
Well compared to my previews benchmark, beta 2.2 is super fast.Maryus3D wrote:Hello!
Here are my results on my GTX275 1792 MB Gigabyte HDMI stock clocks with Q6600 @ 2,4 GHz , 8 GB ram A-Data DDR2 800 MHz, MSI P35 using hackintosh OSX 10.6.3. Octane render 1.021 beta 2.1 demo .
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us