Just denoise.
EDIT: Made With NeatImage for After Effects. Really need to get the Photoshop plugin too. It will save time.
Noisefree interiors?
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
- Attachments
-
PURE3D Visualisierungen
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
NeatImage looks promising, thanks.
Maybe some lightboxes will help too...
Maybe some lightboxes will help too...
Octane for 3ds Max v2.21.1 | i7-5930K | 32GB | 1 x GTX Titan Z + 2 x GTX 980 Ti
or, render high-res, bluring the image with inbuild tools that will get rid of the noise inside Octane Render without need of external programs - works good for me for certain scenes (but not always, not for all) wrote a bit 'bout it on my site http://tomglimps.com/lounge-chair-downl ... ne-render/
cheers
cheers
also Nik tools - Dfine.. for denoising.. of course those can affect details, but with Nik tools you can easily affect regions instead of whole render..
- but anyways - your original render looks nice in a way - the noise is almost looking like grain - you can use some of those shitty instagram filters and it will look like its captered via smartphone - actually Nik tools is like instagram for grownups
- looks like it's time for octane to do a "grain" kernel, or do it in posteffects, and utilize that noise so it looks like old picture..
- but anyways - your original render looks nice in a way - the noise is almost looking like grain - you can use some of those shitty instagram filters and it will look like its captered via smartphone - actually Nik tools is like instagram for grownups
- looks like it's time for octane to do a "grain" kernel, or do it in posteffects, and utilize that noise so it looks like old picture..
3dmax, zbrush, UE
//Behance profile //BOONAR
//Octane render toolbox 3dsmax
//Behance profile //BOONAR
//Octane render toolbox 3dsmax
Hi Thomas_p,tomas_p wrote:Octane render, pathtracing, 2048 bounces, 7114 samples, 1 hour, glossy walls, gtx 690, lited only by white environment.
nice test... and really noisefree!
So is it the "2048 bounces" setting, that eliminates noise with pathtracing?
Did you try the same scene with PMC?
Greetings,
ChrisVis
C4D R15 - C4DOctane 4.0 | Win7 64 | NVIDIA 417.22 | EVGA GTX 980 Ti SC | EVGA GTX 780 Ti SC |EVGA GTX 780 Ti SC
i7 4930K 6x4.3GHz OC | 64GB | ASUS P9X79-E WS
+ Netstor Turbobox 250A | 2x EVGA GTX 780 Ti SC + 2 x Palit GTX780 Ti 3GB | all watercooled
i7 4930K 6x4.3GHz OC | 64GB | ASUS P9X79-E WS
+ Netstor Turbobox 250A | 2x EVGA GTX 780 Ti SC + 2 x Palit GTX780 Ti 3GB | all watercooled
Neat Image did a pretty good job. Try to render it at 8k (DL diffuse) and then reduce it to 2k.
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Hi ChrisVis
No, I don't try render this scene with PMC.
I think with PMC depends the rendertime on many things and setings.
But if you don't need the reflection of something in glass of windows, don't use the glass and use the portals instead of that and the render time will be much better. But if you render scene with lots of glass (for example 8 or more plates of glass) and lots of inner corners, chose PMC and set RR probability to 1,0. The rendertime will be terrible long, but the image will be relative noisefree in corners and axros the multiple glass. If you want render interiors with window glass, try compromis. Pathtracing with RR probability 0,0 and 24 bounces or PMC with RR probability betwen 0.85 - 0.95 and 24 bounces. Plus denoising. Or trie render it 2 times larger and than downsample it. But with the PMC will be the rendertime probably always longer than with pathtracing.
No, I don't try render this scene with PMC.
I think with PMC depends the rendertime on many things and setings.
But if you don't need the reflection of something in glass of windows, don't use the glass and use the portals instead of that and the render time will be much better. But if you render scene with lots of glass (for example 8 or more plates of glass) and lots of inner corners, chose PMC and set RR probability to 1,0. The rendertime will be terrible long, but the image will be relative noisefree in corners and axros the multiple glass. If you want render interiors with window glass, try compromis. Pathtracing with RR probability 0,0 and 24 bounces or PMC with RR probability betwen 0.85 - 0.95 and 24 bounces. Plus denoising. Or trie render it 2 times larger and than downsample it. But with the PMC will be the rendertime probably always longer than with pathtracing.
Win Vista 64 | Phenom II X4 905e |Gigabyte GTX690 and zotac Geforce GTX260 | 8GB
tomas_p wrote:Hi ChrisVis
No, I don't try render this scene with PMC.
I think with PMC depends the rendertime on many things and setings.
But if you don't need the reflection of something in glass of windows, don't use the glass and use the portals instead of that and the render time will be much better. But if you render scene with lots of glass (for example 8 or more plates of glass) and lots of inner corners, chose PMC and set RR probability to 1,0. The rendertime will be terrible long, but the image will be relative noisefree in corners and axros the multiple glass. If you want render interiors with window glass, try compromis. Pathtracing with RR probability 0,0 and 24 bounces or PMC with RR probability betwen 0.85 - 0.95 and 24 bounces. Plus denoising. Or trie render it 2 times larger and than downsample it. But with the PMC will be the rendertime probably always longer than with pathtracing.
Very interesting info. Is RR prob. documented anywhere or this comes from your experience?
3090, Titan, Quadro, Xeon Scalable Supermicro, 768GB RAM; Sketchup Pro, Classical Architecture.
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Custom alloy powder coated laser cut cases, Autodesk metal-sheet 3D modelling.
build-log http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=42540
Long time Octane fan here. Used it for my professional work over the last two years. I have to say that from my experience, Octane really isn't that fast compared to other cpu based engines (I'm in the process of switching to corona). Especially interior scenes. With PT it requires a bunch of trickery to get a high resolution, near noise free images. Even for exterior scenes with complex vegetation I get faster results with Corona.
Sure, you can probably make the case for Octane being the fastest engine, but that's with 2k+ worth of GPUs or with cloud rendering (which I'm eagerly awaiting)
That is just from my experience. Maybe I've been setting up my scenes the wrong way, but I've browsed the forums for solutions such as setting caustic blur to 1 and all the little hacks mentioned in this post. I just kind of gave up on it.
Sure, you can probably make the case for Octane being the fastest engine, but that's with 2k+ worth of GPUs or with cloud rendering (which I'm eagerly awaiting)
That is just from my experience. Maybe I've been setting up my scenes the wrong way, but I've browsed the forums for solutions such as setting caustic blur to 1 and all the little hacks mentioned in this post. I just kind of gave up on it.