Octane vs Arnold
Has anybody done a comparision?
intel i7 3770k // 2 x Evga Titan Superclocked 6gb Vram // 16gb RAM
http://www.octavioalonso.com
http://www.octavioalonso.com
ok but in terms of quality/photorealism?
intel i7 3770k // 2 x Evga Titan Superclocked 6gb Vram // 16gb RAM
http://www.octavioalonso.com
http://www.octavioalonso.com
- pepasystem
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:03 pm
test
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
780TI, 980, i74770k, 32GB
- pepasystem
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 6:03 pm
...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
780TI, 980, i74770k, 32GB
Thanks for the images. Anyone have done a test?
intel i7 3770k // 2 x Evga Titan Superclocked 6gb Vram // 16gb RAM
http://www.octavioalonso.com
http://www.octavioalonso.com
yes, but octane doesn't have displacement, all types of motion blur, render-time subdivisions, doesn't support fluids and curves(etc for hairs), doesn't have lightfilters (etc gobo, lightdecay and so on), doesn't have light blockers, doesn't support IBL + sun, doesn't have render region, and have very few AOVs, and slower and slower with each implemented feature... and octane doesn't have public c++ and python SDK for 3rd party developers...so IMHO on this stage of development such comparison is pointless
Win 7 x64 | GTX560Ti | Core i7 960 3.2GHz | 24GB RAM