Just made a quick comparison. Render time for all: 2 min.
Octane is Pathtracing (sorry only demo mode), V-Ray is Brute Force (16 Subd) + Light Cache (900 Subd, SampleSize 0,01 Retrace Trshld), Maxwell is Maxwell.
All had the same HDRI.
Really no speed contest here, because graphic card is fairly weak.
i7 2600
gtx 560ti
Don't know if it's meaningful or anything, just personal interest.
Octane VS Maxwell VS VRay
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
- Attachments
-
-
-
Last edited by RobSteady on Sat Aug 24, 2013 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Octane for 3ds Max v2.21.1 | i7-5930K | 32GB | 1 x GTX Titan Z + 2 x GTX 980 Ti
Maxell has the most contrast in details, I think.
But why is Octane not rendering the details on the adjust wheel in the top left corner?
But why is Octane not rendering the details on the adjust wheel in the top left corner?
Octane for 3ds Max v2.21.1 | i7-5930K | 32GB | 1 x GTX Titan Z + 2 x GTX 980 Ti
Good question !RobSteady wrote:But why is Octane not rendering the details on the adjust wheel in the top left corner?
I have the same issue using PMC vs Direct Lighting. I lost certain thin lines that i would expect to see in the model. I was wondering if it was due to the filter size, so have tried reducing it down to 1.1 from 1.5, but its not helping....
Win7 64bit. i7 3930K 4.2Ghz.32GbRam. GTX670(4Gb)+2xGTX580(3Gb) | 3xGTX780(3Gb). 337.88. 1200W. (+ 5 x i7 2600 nodes).
Most likely the "kernel" -> "rayepsilon" is incorrect.But why is Octane not rendering the details on the adjust wheel in the top left corner?
Win7/Win10/Mavericks/Mint 17 - GTX550Ti/GT640M
Octane Plugin Support : Poser, ArchiCAD, Revit, Inventor, AutoCAD, Rhino, Modo, Nuke
Pls read before submitting a support question
Octane Plugin Support : Poser, ArchiCAD, Revit, Inventor, AutoCAD, Rhino, Modo, Nuke
Pls read before submitting a support question
-
Elvissuperstar007
- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
- Location: Ukraine
- Contact:
corona render the best
Win11/msi x79a-gd45 (8d)/ Intel Xeon e5 2690v0/ 64gb DDR3 1866/ Nvidia 4090 Asus TUF/ be quiet! Straight Power 11 1000W 80 Plus Platinum
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
A filter size of 1.5 is wayy to high. 1.1-1.2 is best.
It may be because of the way octane shades its normals, try turning off smooth shading to see if it comes back.
It may be because of the way octane shades its normals, try turning off smooth shading to see if it comes back.
Intel quad core i5 @ 4.0 ghz | 8 gigs of Ram | Geforce GTX 470 - 1.25 gigs of Ram
Seeing this post, I unfortunately realized that I`ve turned out to be an Octane hooligan, more than a fanatic that I can not question myself and always react "Octane is the better".
After calming down and reviewing, I strongly aggree with the "filter size" comment. But I have one more thing: I realized that its all about mapping in Octane. You need Normal Mapping. I just can not understand why but in my opinion, "you always need normal mapping, at least -mostly-" in order to get better details in renders. And this makes me sick but I`m still a fanatic. Please correct me if I`m wrong.
After calming down and reviewing, I strongly aggree with the "filter size" comment. But I have one more thing: I realized that its all about mapping in Octane. You need Normal Mapping. I just can not understand why but in my opinion, "you always need normal mapping, at least -mostly-" in order to get better details in renders. And this makes me sick but I`m still a fanatic. Please correct me if I`m wrong.
Win7 64 & Slackware 14 64 | 3x Zotac 580 amp & 1x MSI 680 | i7 3930K @4.8 | 32 GB | Asus rampage extreme IV