Day light models (updated)

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Post Reply

What day light model do you like?

1 (doesn't work with AO well)
17
18%
2
14
14%
3 (doesn't work with AO well)
3
3%
4
23
24%
5
40
41%
 
Total votes: 97
User avatar
IMPICHMENT
Licensed Customer
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:16 am
Location: Russia| Rostov

1or 2
1 and 2, the model for noon, but for sunset 4. (1 и 2 модель для полудня , а вот для заката 4)
Cinema4D R14.|Octane Stand | Octane for C4D next Corona render
Win8 [64]. I7 3930K . GTX580
Top
User avatar
Karba
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2300
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:05 am

Ok, what about 5?
Top
User avatar
IMPICHMENT
Licensed Customer
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:16 am
Location: Russia| Rostov

Yes! 5 is the most ideal
Cinema4D R14.|Octane Stand | Octane for C4D next Corona render
Win8 [64]. I7 3930K . GTX580
Top
User avatar (Default)
cbapog
Licensed Customer
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:56 pm

Карба, а давай все 5 в релиз уже!
Top
User avatar
suvakas
Licensed Customer
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:26 am

Are there any technical reasons why all of these can't be implemented as user selectable options?

Suv
Top
User avatar
Karba
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2300
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:05 am

suvakas wrote:Are there any technical reasons why all of these can't be implemented as user selectable options?

Suv
Too many options make Octane more complex, unstable and slow.
Top
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2507
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine/Russia
Contact:
Contact Elvissuperstar007

all variants)!
https://www.google.ru/search?q=%D0%BD%D ... 0&bih=1032
the sky is different

https://www.google.ru/search?q=%D0%BD%D ... 0&bih=1032
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
Top
User avatar
suvakas
Licensed Customer
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 10:26 am

Karba wrote:
suvakas wrote:Are there any technical reasons why all of these can't be implemented as user selectable options?

Suv
Too many options make Octane more complex, unstable and slow.
I see. Ok. It's up to developers then. But please pick the most realistic model. The one that is in Max plugin 1.10 is just awful.
Number 4 would be my choice from current selection.

Suv

Ps. To users who think shadows are too dark or whatever, shadows can always be tweaked using gamma value.
Here's number 4 with tweaked gamma.
Attachments
sky4_gamma.jpg
sky4_gamma.jpg (20.8 KiB) Viewed 3280 times
Top
User avatar
Karba
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2300
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:05 am

suvakas wrote:
Karba wrote:
suvakas wrote:Are there any technical reasons why all of these can't be implemented as user selectable options?

Suv
Too many options make Octane more complex, unstable and slow.
I see. Ok. It's up to developers then. But please pick the most realistic model. The one that is in Max plugin 1.10 is just awful.
Number 4 would be my choice from current selection.

Suv

Ps. To users who think shadows are too dark or whatever, shadows can always be tweaked using gamma value.
Here's number 4 with tweaked gamma.
Difference between 4 and 5 - only sky saturation. in 5 blue color is not so saturated.
Top
User avatar
face
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:10 pm
Location: Germany

I would say 1 has the best natural look. Not to blueish, yellowish, greenish and the gamma/saturation is perfekt.
I also like the shadows a lot...

face
Win10 Pro, Driver 378.78, Softimage 2015SP2 & Octane 3.05 RC1,
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”