GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Post, discuss and share handy resources like textures, models and HDRI maps in this forum.
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
Locked
User avatar
Proupin
Licensed Customer
Posts: 735
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:01 am
Location: Barcelona
Contact:

http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... 30&start=0; here are the tests I did a while ago
Win 7 64bits / Intel i5 750 @ 2.67Ghz / Geforce GTX 470 / 8GB Ram / 3DS Max 2012 64bits
http://proupinworks.blogspot.com/
User avatar
grimm
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 8:11 pm
Location: Spokane, Washington, USA

Proupin wrote:I don't know if it's the OS because you didn't include it in your signature... but anyway, I found beta2 slighty slower than the previous version. I have done some benchmarks with the material sampler, and not only beta2 is much slower but with the same amount of samples it leaves much more noise behind... (and don't look the same : | )
It is in my sig, Fedora 12 is a Linux distro. ;) I should change my sig to reflect that.

Grimm
Linux Mint 21.3 x64 | Nvidia GTX 980 4GB (displays) RTX 2070 8GB| Intel I7 5820K 3.8 Ghz | 32Gb Memory | Nvidia Driver 535.171
Aaaaahole
Licensed Customer
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:26 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

My old 8800GTX.
0.82 MegaSamples/sec. Time for an upgrade.
Attachments
OctaneBenchmark8800gtx.jpg
Win7 64 | i7 870 @ 3.2GHZ | GTX 780 3GB | 16GB | Phantom Scatter |
Fueye
Licensed Customer
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:24 pm
Location: Berlin

And my GTX260 - 1.42 Ms/s
Attachments
beta2_gtx260_1.42mega.png
Win XP 64 / Zotac Geforce GTX470 / Q9550 2.83GHz / 8GB
Win XP 64 / PNY Geforce GTX470 / Q6700 2.67GHz / 8GB
buda
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: Ukraine

have any test with octane RC1 and GTX470/480 ?
cuda
pixym
Licensed Customer
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

You would better follow this thread:
http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... f=9&t=1286
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
buda
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: Ukraine

pixym wrote:You would better follow this thread:
http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... f=9&t=1286
I dont have acces to this thread :| can you post here some results? Thanks.
cuda
pixym
Licensed Customer
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Some results:

480GTX: 2.8 Ms/s
280GTX@615mhz (240 cuda cores) 1GB: 2.07 Ms/s
GTX295: 1.47 Ms/s (one GPU only)
Nvidia 8800GT: 0,67Ms/s
GTX 285: 1,92 Ms/s
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
buda
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:28 pm
Location: Ukraine

pixym wrote:Some results:

480GTX: 2.8 Ms/s
280GTX@615mhz (240 cuda cores) 1GB: 2.07 Ms/s
GTX295: 1.47 Ms/s (one GPU only)
Nvidia 8800GT: 0,67Ms/s
GTX 285: 1,92 Ms/s
so RC1 dont full support fermi..
cuda
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

buda wrote:
pixym wrote:Some results:

480GTX: 2.8 Ms/s
280GTX@615mhz (240 cuda cores) 1GB: 2.07 Ms/s
GTX295: 1.47 Ms/s (one GPU only)
Nvidia 8800GT: 0,67Ms/s
GTX 285: 1,92 Ms/s
so RC1 dont full support fermi..
yes it does, it's got a fermi kernel in it.
we haven't fully explored the optimizations yet though.
it's a lot of work...

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
Locked

Return to “Resources and Sharing”