GTX470 benchmarks / comparison

Post, discuss and share handy resources like textures, models and HDRI maps in this forum.
Forum rules
Please do not post any material that is copyrighted or restricted from public use in any way. OTOY NZ LTD and it's forum members are not liable for any copyright infringements on material in this forum. Please contact us if this is the case and we will remove the material in question.
Locked
User avatar (Default)
pixym
Licensed Customer
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Your render is very weird :o
I have the same card as yours.
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
Top
User avatar
justix
Licensed Customer
Posts: 585
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:01 pm

pixym wrote:Your render is very weird :o
I have the same card as yours.
....maybe it's out of focus? :?
Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
Top
User avatar (Default)
pixym
Licensed Customer
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

Smoothing issue I thing…
You have just to open the file then clic on the octane_benchmark.obj node in the Graph editor.
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
Top
User avatar
justix
Licensed Customer
Posts: 585
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:01 pm

pixym wrote:Smoothing issue I thing…
You have just to open the file then clic on the octane_benchmark.obj node in the Graph editor.
Ooops... 8-) Thanks
Attachments
test.jpg
Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
Top
User avatar (Default)
RayTracey
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 377
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:58 pm
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Contact:
Contact RayTracey

DavidT wrote:It looks like my GTX 470 averaged about 2.06 megasamples/sec.
Only 112 of the available 448 cores are recognized by Octane, so if you're getting 2.05 Msamples/sec now, with the fix that would mean 8.20 MSamples/sec with all cores enabled :o . I hope I'm not overlooking something here. Crossing my fingers!
Top
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

daft_punk wrote:
DavidT wrote:It looks like my GTX 470 averaged about 2.06 megasamples/sec.
Only 112 of the available 448 cores are recognized by Octane, so if you're getting 2.05 Msamples/sec now, with the fix that would mean 8.20 MSamples/sec with all cores enabled :o . I hope I'm not overlooking something here. Crossing my fingers!
tomorrow i'm going to research why it says 112 cores.
it could be a bug in the way i display them and the card is actually using all of it's cores,
however i'm not sure.

i'll post more information tomorrow after my research :)

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
Top
User avatar (Default)
pixym
Licensed Customer
Posts: 597
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: French West Indies

8.20 MSamples/sec... that would be enormous :o
Work Station : MB ASUS X299-Pro/SE - Intel i9 7980XE (2,6ghz 18 cores / 36 threads) - Ram 64GB - RTX4090 + RTX3090 - Win10 64
NET RENDER : MB ASUS P9X79 - Intel i7 - Ram 16GB - Two RTX 3080 TI - Win 10 64
Top
User avatar
ttaberna
Licensed Customer
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:02 pm
Location: BCN

Some guy reported the same issue in his gtx480 in Arion that it only sees 120 cores
Hope it is fixed in octane for next release, cos -i'm planning buying this 480 beauties, although I am specting some more ram versions...maybe in near future i hot
Cheers
Rampage IV Extreme+i7 3920k+2x GTX580 3GB+2x GTX470
Top
User avatar
justix
Licensed Customer
Posts: 585
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:01 pm

daft_punk wrote:
DavidT wrote:It looks like my GTX 470 averaged about 2.06 megasamples/sec.
Only 112 of the available 448 cores are recognized by Octane, so if you're getting 2.05 Msamples/sec now, with the fix that would mean 8.20 MSamples/sec with all cores enabled :o . I hope I'm not overlooking something here. Crossing my fingers!
aaaaaaaaaaahhhhh....now I see why I could not understand how my poor 8800GT was actually giving me 2.05Msamples in another project...it has in facts 112 Cores...come on...unleash the Beast!...I'm next for a GTX470 (come ooooooon...hurry up lazy postman) :lol:
Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
Top
User avatar (Default)
andrian
Licensed Customer
Posts: 641
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:48 pm
Location: Bulgaria
Contact:
Contact andrian

Here its mine, with GTX 260 Sonic overclocked edition and my second 8800 GTS 512.
Attachments
GTX 260 2.jpg
GTS 8800 512.jpg
Vista 64 , 2x Xeon 5440 - 24GB RAM, 1x GTX 260 & I7 3930 water cooled - 32GB RAM, 1 x GTX 480+ 1x8800 GTS 512
CGsociety gallery
My portfolio
My portfolio2 - under construction
Web site
Making of : pool scene - part1
Top
Locked

Return to “Resources and Sharing”