Hi guys, I'm looking to upgrade my video card, so I did some research. I looked up prices of various cards, and their GFLOP rating from wikipedia, and figured out which cards provide the most bang for your buck.
You can view the actual spreadsheet here or download as CSV here
So it looks like if you have more than one slot and don't need 3GB RAM, it's a much better idea to get two lower-end cards than one high-end card. As I have extra PCI slots in my motherboard, it looks like my best option is to get a second 460! Boring!
One question I have is whether the GFLOP rating accurately reflects Octane performance in the case of the 460/560. This is due to the warp scheduler issue that prevents 1/3 of the cores from working in Octane... Maybe I'll put together a new benchmarking thread with a form and stuff to figure this out...
CHART: Cost-effectiveness of various NVidia cards for Octane
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
- Jaberwocky
- Posts: 976
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:03 pm
Quote "One question I have is whether the GFLOP rating accurately reflects Octane performance in the case of the 460/560. This is due to the warp scheduler issue that prevents 1/3 of the cores from working in Octane... Maybe I'll put together a new benchmarking thread with a form and stuff to figure this out..."
Yes this is a question that may well need to be answered again now that Octanes using Cuda 4.I suspect that the answer will be the same.The Old chip has a bottleneck as far as Cuda apps are concerned.
The obvious check would be a GTX460 against say a GTX580 using one of the test scenes when the latest beta comes out sometime this week.If the problems been solved then the 460 should perform at about 336/512 IE about 2/3rd's of the speed of the 580 which uses a full fat chip.If it runs at under half speed then we have the answer.
Yes this is a question that may well need to be answered again now that Octanes using Cuda 4.I suspect that the answer will be the same.The Old chip has a bottleneck as far as Cuda apps are concerned.
The obvious check would be a GTX460 against say a GTX580 using one of the test scenes when the latest beta comes out sometime this week.If the problems been solved then the 460 should perform at about 336/512 IE about 2/3rd's of the speed of the 580 which uses a full fat chip.If it runs at under half speed then we have the answer.
CPU:-AMD 1055T 6 core, Motherboard:-Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 AM3+, Gigabyte GTX 460-1GB, RAM:-8GB Kingston hyper X Genesis DDR3 1600Mhz D/Ch, Hard Disk:-500GB samsung F3 , OS:-Win7 64bit
Good stuff this, thanks. I have both gtx590 and gtx460 2GB, so when the next (final 2.5) version of Octane will be released, i can do some benchmarks to compare them and settle the "superscalar issue" with 460 once and for all. Will need to install the 460 into my older compy first though
I will post back then.

I will post back then.
Intel Core i7 980x @ 3,78GHz - Gigabyte X58A UD7 rev 1.0 - 24GB DDR3 RAM - Gainward GTX590 3GB @ 700/1400/3900 Mhz- 2x Intel X25-M G2 80GB SSD - WD Caviar Black 2TB - WD Caviar Green 2TB - Fractal Design Define R2 - Win7 64bit - Octane 2.57
There is also the notion of power consumption that could be taken in account in the long range cost... Two GTX 460 for example could require more power than one GTX 480 or 580... just a thought.
French Blender user - CPU : intel Quad QX9650 at 3GHz - 8GB of RAM - Windows 7 Pro 64 bits. Display GPU : GeForce GTX 480 (2 Samsung 2443BW-1920x1600 monitors). External GPUs : two EVGA GTX 580 3GB in a Cubix GPU-Xpander Pro 2. NVidia Driver : 368.22.
- understand
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:05 pm
- Location: berlin
the best is the 460 2gb version. totally monster card and cheap
Win 8.0 64-bit | Gainward 460 GTX 2048mb (driver: latest) | Phenom 965 3.4ghz 140w | 12GB
Win 8.1 64-bit | EVGA 780ti Superclocked 3072mb (driver: latest) | i7 4930k 3.4ghz | 32GB
Win 7 64-bit Bootcamp | 650M 1GB (driver: 327.23) | i7 2.7ghz | 8GB
Win 8.1 64-bit | EVGA 780ti Superclocked 3072mb (driver: latest) | i7 4930k 3.4ghz | 32GB
Win 7 64-bit Bootcamp | 650M 1GB (driver: 327.23) | i7 2.7ghz | 8GB
I want to know how you guys can get graphics cards so cheap. The prices in that chart are way lower than I would have to pay.
(HW) Intel i7 2600k, 16GB DDR3, MSI 560GTX ti (2GB) x 3
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)