Hello!
I bought last week a GTX 560 TI 1GB, but today I have the offer to exchange for a GTX 480.
For work with Octane Render is a good trade?
Exchange GTX 560TI for 480 - good trade?
- tehfailsafe
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:27 pm
Curious since I was thinking of upgrading to the 560ti, is it really that much slower than the 480?
Why do the two benchmark screens look different? The 560 one looks like the colors are a bit off, almost like pathtracing but I don't think it is...
Edit:
Actually, my one of my non oc'd 470s gets higher than your shot of the 560ti... Can that be right?
9.6 Ms/sec - 18.32 FPS
Why do the two benchmark screens look different? The 560 one looks like the colors are a bit off, almost like pathtracing but I don't think it is...
Edit:
Actually, my one of my non oc'd 470s gets higher than your shot of the 560ti... Can that be right?
9.6 Ms/sec - 18.32 FPS
windows 7 64 bit| GTX580 1.5Gb x2 | Intel 2600k @ 4.9 | 16gb ddr3 | 3ds max 2012
i think the 470 is more powerfull than the 560ti. 470 got more cores and better memomy bandwith, so its a lil faster..
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-ge ... ti-us.html
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_ge ... 70_us.html
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-ge ... ti-us.html
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_ge ... 70_us.html
- Mint 10 64bit nvidia drv 260.19.29/cudatoolkit3.0 intel q6600, 4gbRAM, GTX470 1,2GB
- Mint 10 64bit/ Win7 64bit nvidia drv 260.19.29/cudatoolkit3.2 amd X6, 16gbRAM, 2x GTX580 3GB
->Octane 2.44/ Blender2.5x
- Mint 10 64bit/ Win7 64bit nvidia drv 260.19.29/cudatoolkit3.2 amd X6, 16gbRAM, 2x GTX580 3GB
->Octane 2.44/ Blender2.5x
460 and 560 or both slower for Octane than 470/480 as they both have less CUDA cores 336/378 to 448/480 albeit on higher frequency. Then there is a superscalar nature of 460/560, whic makesd the card run once at full power (336/378), other times at 2/3 of power (224/256 cores), depending on the level of parallelism of the code. More parallel the code is, more cores the card uses. With Octane unfortunately the card does not run at full, at least it looks that way comparing performance of Octane versions 3.0 and 3.2 and your results (diffrence between 470 and 560) only prove it further.
I would really appreciate, if the devs made a statement about this, cause sofar its just an assumption based on the real-world performance, but maybe were just doing it wrong
I would really appreciate, if the devs made a statement about this, cause sofar its just an assumption based on the real-world performance, but maybe were just doing it wrong

Intel Core i7 980x @ 3,78GHz - Gigabyte X58A UD7 rev 1.0 - 24GB DDR3 RAM - Gainward GTX590 3GB @ 700/1400/3900 Mhz- 2x Intel X25-M G2 80GB SSD - WD Caviar Black 2TB - WD Caviar Green 2TB - Fractal Design Define R2 - Win7 64bit - Octane 2.57