Octane benchmark

Discuss or ask critique about your current works
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.


For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
truerender
Licensed Customer
Posts: 100
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:01 pm

This is result of this benchmark on my cards with th 2.13 version.
Attachments
result.jpg
-=OCTANE_RENDER=-.rar
(3.35 MiB) Downloaded 310 times
xxdanbrowne
Licensed Customer
Posts: 503
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:38 am

Nvidia 880m
benchmark @ 1920 x 1080 px = 9.21 Ms/s
voto1979
Licensed Customer
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:24 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

1x GTX Titan Black between 9 and 12 Ms/sec (Render-Time 10min)
10 Ms/sec was the average
voto.1979
Windows 8.1 / Octane Standalone Application / GTX Titan Black 6GB + GTX 970 / Intel Core i7-4930K CPU @ 3.40GHZ (6 Core / 12 Threads) / LG 34UC87
User avatar
glimpse
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:17 pm
Contact:

I'm just curious, why do we need another benchmark scene?
wouldn't it be better to follow old thread? just curious..
heartlessphil
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:23 am

Just wondering, why max depth = 64? I read in the manual that light practically never bounce more than 16 times...
Post Reply

Return to “Works In Progress”