Buy older graphics card with 4gb or newer with 2gb?

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Post Reply
Thirdeye
Licensed Customer
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:06 pm

Hi,

I have a question regarding graphic cards for my laptop. I use it for rendering with Octane of course. I have two options but uncertain which is the better for rendering in Octane. The first one is this:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M - 2gb DDR5

and the other is this model:

NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M - 4gb DDR3


So the question is if I should get the older 4gb or a newer 2gb Nvidia? Whats the difference? If any one could help me a bit it would be fantastic! Thanks
paviaden
Licensed Customer
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:59 am

The difference in speed inbetween thoese two is neglible - however with only 384 cuda cores its not really anything that wil go anywhere fast
xxdanbrowne
Licensed Customer
Posts: 503
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:38 am

Speed wise they are pretty close. The one with 4GB of ram can obviously holder a scene with twice the amount of geometry so you could go to a higher level of detail.
Thirdeye
Licensed Customer
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:06 pm

Thanks for the replys,

I can see the GTX 760m has 768 cuda cores compared to the 384 cuda cores of the GT 750M. Is that a unnoticeable difference?

For archviz interiors is 2gb of vram enough?
User avatar
glimpse
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:17 pm
Contact:

Thirdeye wrote:Thanks for the replys,

I can see the GTX 760m has 768 cuda cores compared to the 384 cuda cores of the GT 750M. Is that a unnoticeable difference?

For archviz interiors is 2gb of vram enough?
what resolutions You're going to work & how complex are Your typical scenes (poly counte, texture count & resolutions, etc..) some mange to work with 1GB cards..though You'll have much less of a headache wile having a bit of headroom to play with..- imagine workin' on a model..in preview resolution, everything is fine..once You get higher res - render will fail, 'cos it's not enough of vram - then at the last minute You'll start trying to optimise textrues & models..but higher resolutions will show more - & thus You need more complexity, more precise textures - so..from personal standpoint I'd go for largest memory I could afford & speed wise.. You can always way a bit longer, just..-it's better than not to be able to render at all =DDD..
Thirdeye
Licensed Customer
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 1:06 pm

Aha - I'm getting wiser now! Thanks.

And the fact that one is DDR3 ram and the other is DDR5 dosen't play a role? I'm totally new to graphicscards!
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”