Producing Animations in 4K at 60 FPS at the end of 2013?

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Post Reply
User avatar
linvanchene
Licensed Customer
Posts: 783
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:58 pm
Location: Switzerland

edited and removed by user
Last edited by linvanchene on Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
pengvisor
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:00 pm

I completely disagree with your vision here - 50 fps is not needed. It will not make images look better. How could they. After I saw Hobbit in iMax I was really disappointed. The feeling was far from cinema like - it was more like a news or sport event that hurts your eyes. Everyone is running away from 50 fps. Motion blur is a crucial factor for the feeling of the movie. with 50 or higher FPS the shutter goes so fast that there is almost no motion blur. generic footage got 180 shutter - that means that if you shoot 25 frames in Europe, the image is registered for 1/50th of the second ( more or less ). To 4K subject. Another PR idea in order to sell more screen, since all of us already have 1080p and they don't break as often as they should :D
I've got 60" screen and the resolution is enough for the sharpness and detail. You would need 100" TV in order to really have the need to upscale the image.
I do own a color grading suite with a $40K Dolby monitor - no one is able to tell the difference between 2.5K and HD images. There is no sense to go higher, beside the need of replacing everything.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”