playing with 1.0
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
- gabrielefx
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 2:00 pm
Looking really good. One little thing that catches my eye is an excessive "isometric" feeling in the 1st and 4th shots. I should try to open more the fov in the camera. That would make the vanishing lines more agressive and will give some extra punch to the image.
Well, not everyOne likes the extreme angle, it's probably more of a taste isue =) it seems that quite a lot product photography is actually cought with 50-80mm standarts. In rare ocasion..for interiors photographers might step towards wider angles ~28mm. The reason here is quite simpe..50mm represents most natural distortion compared to human eye.PAQUITO wrote:Looking really good. One little thing that catches my eye is an excessive "isometric" feeling in the 1st and 4th shots. I should try to open more the fov in the camera. That would make the vanishing lines more agressive and will give some extra punch to the image.
not quite true maybe - we have a lot of peripheral vision, stereo too - think that 50mm lens thingy comes from Henri Cartier Bresson asking Leica for a 'normal' and "democratic' lens, on a 35mm camera
a lot of photographers I know use 24mm lens for interiors.. and shift it left and right as well as up and down
images are nice, but wouldn't the concrete panels be larger?
a lot of photographers I know use 24mm lens for interiors.. and shift it left and right as well as up and down
images are nice, but wouldn't the concrete panels be larger?
workstation well past its sell-by-date, Vista 64 bit (!) with a pitiful amount of RAM, re-invigorated with a GX 590
3ds Max Design 2011 (have 2013 but can't be bothered to re-do all the UI), CS5, and that free z-brush program, whatever it's called
3ds Max Design 2011 (have 2013 but can't be bothered to re-do all the UI), CS5, and that free z-brush program, whatever it's called