Choice of the renderer

Discuss or ask critique about your current works
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.

For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Post Reply
User avatar
lilbignik
Licensed Customer
Posts: 64
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:36 pm
Location: Russia, Nizhnii Novgorod
Contact:
Contact lilbignik

Hi guys.
Some days ago I tried to compare several renderers: Octane, Indigo, Maxwell and Physical renderer from Cinema4D.
For a basis has taken a free interior scene and little bit changed. At first I did it in Physical renderer(it is not un-basiad render, but the principle is similar. it have physical parametres and outgoing noise) As a result the good picture I have taken after 40 minutes. Thus I have decided to limit time of all render to 40 minutes.
Parameters of a computer i7 950 3Gh, GTX 580 .
Please don't estimate design, and quality render. It only the test. There are bit different renderers settings, I had not much time to get everything set up perfectly the same. And sorry for my english. :?

And now results!
Attachments
PHYSICAL RENDERER(CINEMA4D) only CPU, 40min, 3 light bounces
PHYSICAL RENDERER(CINEMA4D) only CPU, 40min, 3 light bounces
OCTANE PMC, 40min, 7 light bounces,
OCTANE PMC, 40min, 7 light bounces,
MAXWELL only CPU, 40min, MULTILIGHT
MAXWELL only CPU, 40min, MULTILIGHT
INDIGO CPU+GPU, 40min, COLOR MULTILIGHT
INDIGO CPU+GPU, 40min, COLOR MULTILIGHT
Sorry for my English
Win 10 x64 / amd fx-9590 5.0Ghz / 3xGTX Titan Black 6gb/ 32gb / ArchiСad 19 / Cinema4D R17 / latest Octane.
Top
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2516
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine
Contact:
Contact Elvissuperstar007

мне кажется или у максвела деализация четче! наверное у октана надо фильтсайз привести в 1.0.. хотя у синемы и индиго детализация как у октана.. получается максвел надо привести в состояние более оптимизированное
Win11/msi x79a-gd45 (8d)/ Intel Xeon e5 2690v0/ 64gb DDR3 1866/ Nvidia 4090 Asus TUF/ be quiet! Straight Power 11 1000W 80 Plus Platinum
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
Top
User avatar
Karba
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2300
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 9:05 am

lilbignik wrote:Hi guys.
Some days ago I tried to compare several renderers: Octane, Indigo, Maxwell and Physical renderer from Cinema4D.
For a basis has taken a free interior scene and little bit changed. At first I did it in Physical renderer(it is not un-basiad render, but the principle is similar. it have physical parametres and outgoing noise) As a result the good picture I have taken after 40 minutes. Thus I have decided to limit time of all render to 40 minutes.
Parameters of a computer i7 950 3Gh, GTX 580 .
Please don't estimate design, and quality render. It only the test. There are bit different renderers settings, I had not much time to get everything set up perfectly the same. And sorry for my english. :?

And now results!
Can I have your scene?
[email protected]
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Works In Progress”