New gtx 680

A public forum for discussing and asking questions about the demo version of Octane Render.
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Leme3D
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 2:46 am

someone already did the test with octane in such a gpu?
those who possess a place of comparative performance of the 580 vs 680
hug
User avatar
t_3
Posts: 2871
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:37 pm

no, we are all waiting for that ;) in the licensed user forums are already a few threads spinning around kepler, and if you search the web for benchmarks you will find some not very promising numbers with opencl benchmarks. so we still have to wait and see how well mere cuda apps will perform...
The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply

1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
9fly
Licensed Customer
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:13 am

Linus from NXIS tested this card and make a lots of comparison between 680 and 7970 and you'll see this card sure pass 7970 in most of the cases.

Go to his channel here http://www.youtube.com/user/LinusTechTips?feature=watch

EVGA had GTX680 Hydro Copper Classified version in 4GB ram but not at this time.
http://www.evga.com/articles/00669/#GTX680HydroCopper

God loves this card.
User avatar
t_3
Posts: 2871
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:37 pm

9fly wrote:Linus from NXIS tested this card and make a lots of comparison between 680 and 7970 and you'll see this card sure pass 7970 in most of the cases.

Go to his channel here http://www.youtube.com/user/LinusTechTips?feature=watch

EVGA had GTX680 Hydro Copper Classified version in 4GB ram but not at this time.
http://www.evga.com/articles/00669/#GTX680HydroCopper

God loves this card.
i love the cat-play part most ;) the rest is games, games games, but still no cuda testing (not even opencl or directx dc). well, no surprise, its a gamer card in first place...
The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply

1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
User avatar
lixai
Licensed Customer
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:32 am
Location: Romania, Bucharest
Contact:

Core i7 860, ZOTAC GTX 580 - 3GB, 2 x GTX TITAN, 32Gb RAM
User avatar
mbetke
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1294
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:12 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

I really Hope nvidia didn't cut the Cuda capabilities and offer them on quadro only. It would make sense to do so.
PURE3D Visualisierungen
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
User avatar
pixelrush
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:11 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

I think Octane users are safe.
Looks like 1.5x performance for us.
Double precision apps will perform poorly for Kepler Geforce though.
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
User avatar
Jaberwocky
Licensed Customer
Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:03 pm

Ok Guys.

Just picked this snippit of info out for those running out of textures on a scene

Quote

Now that the number of texture units doubled, NVIDIA also changed the way how Texture Units operate. In the pre-Kepler era, you could use up to 128 simultaneous textures. Bindless Textures are probably the key reason why Samaritan can run on a single card, and why the performance of GT 640M and GTX 680 is where it is. This feature increased the number of simultaneous textures from 128 to over a million. Yes, you've read this correctly. An engine developer can now run its shader code on all the textures he or she plans to use and run those textures as they come along. In ideal circumstances, Samaritan demo can address operations on 200-300…1000 textures and Kepler gives you that level.

:shock:

I picked it up out of this review

Link

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/20 ... x?pageid=2

Interesting

Texture problem solved ? :o
CPU:-AMD 1055T 6 core, Motherboard:-Gigabyte 990FXA-UD3 AM3+, Gigabyte GTX 460-1GB, RAM:-8GB Kingston hyper X Genesis DDR3 1600Mhz D/Ch, Hard Disk:-500GB samsung F3 , OS:-Win7 64bit
User avatar
pixelrush
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1618
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:11 pm
Location: Nelson, New Zealand

Hundreds of textures...that would be nice...provided you have the vram for it.... conveniently we have a 4gb option this time :geek: 8-)
I am not disappointed by Kepler so far. Hoping the 660 and 670 are decent cuda performers too. The good thing about the die shrink too is the cards are shorter (0.5" for 680) so if you have a restricted case like mine there are more options.
All we need now is Octane built for cuda 4.1 and tweaked for the extra textures - assuming its true - (and with transform and instances of course!) and gpu rendering will really power ahead.
I vote we send Terrence to the US to buy a few for testing. He can afford it and he doesn't seem to be doing anything ATM :P
i7-3820 @4.3Ghz | 24gb | Win7pro-64
GTS 250 display + 2 x GTX 780 cuda| driver 331.65
Octane v1.55
User avatar
t_3
Posts: 2871
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:37 pm

:shock: :shock: :shock:
whoa - great find. this together with 4gb cards alone will make it worth the buy, if octane performance is just as good as with 5xx cards. used 3gb gtx 580 anybody? :D
The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply

1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
Post Reply

Return to “Demo Version Questions & Discussion”