GPU advice
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
I am building a new Octane system. I am currently torn between buying a GTX580 or 2 GTX560 cards. Any thoughts? I am assuming that that 2 x 560 cards would have the edge over a single 580?
(HW) Intel i7 2600k, 16GB DDR3, MSI 560GTX ti (2GB) x 3
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
... but only very slightly. not only the shader count, um, counts, but also the narrower ram interface of the 560 (256 vs 384 bits). if you choose a slightly factory oc'ed gtx 580 (around 810 mhz, which is save as can be), it'll be just as fast as two standard 560s, but consuming less power, producing less heat, costing less(?) and adds the option to expand by another 580 later on.steveps3 wrote:I am assuming that that 2 x 560 cards would have the edge over a single 580?
„The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply ‟
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
Actually an OC'd 580 won't cost much less (or even a bit more) than 2 x 560s
Anyone out there got either of these rigs that they can run the benchmark scene against in order to do a direct comparison?
Anyone out there got either of these rigs that they can run the benchmark scene against in order to do a direct comparison?
(HW) Intel i7 2600k, 16GB DDR3, MSI 560GTX ti (2GB) x 3
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
Previously i had a dual gtx 460 2gb, this summer i have changed them with 2 gtx 590 and it was like changing from a Vespa 50cc to a Ducati Monster, just my 2 cents
ciao beppe

ciao beppe
My budget will only cover 1 x 580 or 2 x 560 cards. I thought that the 2 x 560 cards were a no brainer but I am starting to have second thoughts.
(HW) Intel i7 2600k, 16GB DDR3, MSI 560GTX ti (2GB) x 3
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
(SW) Octane (1.50) Blender (2.70) (exporter 2.02)
(OS) Windows 7(64)
btw, i did a comparison chart a while ago (sticky in this forum), that'll give some core numbers. even if the 2 560s are a little faster, you will hardly note the difference imo. and a single card setup is just easier to handle (and safes a little on the electricity bill too ;)steveps3 wrote:My budget will only cover 1 x 580 or 2 x 560 cards. I thought that the 2 x 560 cards were a no brainer but I am starting to have second thoughts.
i did also run the benchmark against my current setup (as i now own 580s) - & with the current octane version; 4.25ms/sec for a single 580 (@ rather save 850mhz)...
„The obvious is that which is never seen until someone expresses it simply ‟
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400
1x i7 2600K @5.0 (Asrock Z77), 16GB, 2x Asus GTX Titan 6GB @1200/3100/6200
2x i7 2600K @4.5 (P8Z68 -V P), 12GB, 1x EVGA GTX 580 3GB @0900/2200/4400