Well, the new ADM cards are out and those perform almost as much as hd6990 dual core in a single core. Nvidia next generation cards unfoutunately not really a step forward in terms of rendering speed. Also HD7970 will be released in a 6gb edition by sapphire soon.
I am plannig a new render workstation based on 4 of these sapphire cards and I would like to kow if octane will be using OPENCL or not within 2-4 months. Can somebody from the staff answer to this?
OPENCL was always suitable,I dont understand why you guys saying this. Its pretty suitable to use for rendering engines. The proof is VrayRT, SLG (smallluxgpu), luxrender, indigo, etc and countless simple renderers.
New gtx 680
Forum rules
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
So..as an owner of a glorious GTX470 and looking to replace it (can double I'm afradi too expensive both money and Powering both) with a faster one should I stay away from the 680?..shame 1530 cores that does not the trick...compare to my Fermi 448 sounded too good for less than 500 Euro (almost)..so any good alternative? the GTX590 is nowhere and still quite expensive for my wallet....
Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
Seems i've posted this not where it should have been posted, but in kepler build..so just copy pasting here, as for some this info might be useful.
Be aware of this 'rebranding' http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia ... 15289.html
What they do is..basicly renameing 5xx to 6xx and with minor tweeks & reseling it to audience =)
..for us, Octane users, there are no performance boost, but rather reduced performance as some of these models are optimised more for efficiency, rather than pure power =) so do Your homework before upgrading..
In few words: buying 6xx not neseceraly leads to better performance & that could be even fermi based card =) You can pay more, to get less =)
@justix 470 is about half as good as 580, so with the later you can cut rendertimes in half! If You manage to find one. =)
Be aware of this 'rebranding' http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia ... 15289.html
What they do is..basicly renameing 5xx to 6xx and with minor tweeks & reseling it to audience =)
..for us, Octane users, there are no performance boost, but rather reduced performance as some of these models are optimised more for efficiency, rather than pure power =) so do Your homework before upgrading..
In few words: buying 6xx not neseceraly leads to better performance & that could be even fermi based card =) You can pay more, to get less =)
@justix 470 is about half as good as 580, so with the later you can cut rendertimes in half! If You manage to find one. =)
GTX580 reduces GTX470 render times by half? Can you show us some benchmarks to confirm this glimpse? If true, i'm buying one 

Oops, sorry 580 is more than twice faster as 460, but only ~30% better than 470 =p get a bit lost in this numbering =) sorry for misslead, my bad =)NBraz wrote:GTX580 reduces GTX470 render times by half? Can you show us some benchmarks to confirm this glimpse? If true, i'm buying one
eheheh! That's what i thought also
But had to ask.

- Elvissuperstar007
- Posts: 2506
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
- Location: Ukraine/Russia
- Contact:
580 VS 680 tests will be?
octane did not seem to support 4.2 CUDA 680 GTX
octane did not seem to support 4.2 CUDA 680 GTX
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
The kepler test build support it...Elvissuperstar007 wrote:580 VS 680 tests will be?
octane did not seem to support 4.2 CUDA 680 GTX
face
Win10 Pro, Driver 378.78, Softimage 2015SP2 & Octane 3.05 RC1,
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
Still far from using 1500 cores like a Fermi card...I'm confused by all this, is this card (GTX680) out of the question or do we have hopes for a screaming HORRAY! soon?face wrote:The kepler test build support it...Elvissuperstar007 wrote:580 VS 680 tests will be?
octane did not seem to support 4.2 CUDA 680 GTX
face

Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
- PolderAnimation
- Posts: 373
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 10:23 am
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
The thing is, those 1500 cuda cores aren't as so strong as the ones in the gtx580.
So we will never see the performance of the 1500 cores like a Fermi card.
Lets hope there are as half as good, that would be nice
.
So we will never see the performance of the 1500 cores like a Fermi card.
Lets hope there are as half as good, that would be nice

Win 10 64bit | RTX 3090 | i9 7960X | 64GB