IES lights - first tests

Discuss or ask critique about your current works
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the left right corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and use pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.


For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
User avatar
mlody47
Licensed Customer
Posts: 868
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:02 pm
Location: Warsaw Poland
Contact:

Chris wrote:The IES emitter material is supposed to be assigned to a sphere instead of a plane or any other object. It won´t lit the scene correctly if not assigned to a sphere.

Chris
Can You give us some proof because I was testing them on planes and I think they are quite good...
Attachments
gtr_N.png
i7 2600K + 2X gtx 580 + GTX 560 Ti + 8gbram + Win7 +
AUTODESK SOFTIMAGE 2012
www.behance.net/mlody47
User avatar
face
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:10 pm
Location: Germany

With spheres, you must use the pitch/yaw/roll orientation.
With planes or discs, you can orient it by you 3d-app, which is much better and can be animated...
But i has read that Roland wrote, spheres are better supported.

face
Win10 Pro, Driver 378.78, Softimage 2015SP2 & Octane 3.05 RC1,
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
User avatar
mlody47
Licensed Customer
Posts: 868
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:02 pm
Location: Warsaw Poland
Contact:

face wrote:With spheres, you must use the pitch/yaw/roll orientation.
With planes or discs, you can orient it by you 3d-app, which is much better and can be animated...
But i has read that Roland wrote, spheres are better supported.

face
great info.. thanks face :) and Roland :)
i7 2600K + 2X gtx 580 + GTX 560 Ti + 8gbram + Win7 +
AUTODESK SOFTIMAGE 2012
www.behance.net/mlody47
User avatar
roeland
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 1823
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:09 pm

A sphere will indeed give the most accurate reproduction of the distribution.

An emitter on a plane without an IES distribution has a radiation pattern with the highest intensity in the direction perpendicular to the plane, gradually falling of to zero in directions parallel to the plane. If you add an IES distribution, this distribution will modulate this radiation pattern, so the distribution will be attenuated for directions far from the normal of the plane. This will be most noticeable for very wide beams, but I think narrow beams will still look OK.
face wrote:With planes or discs, you can orient it by you 3d-app, which is much better and can be animated...
This is not the case, Octane always orients the light sources relative to the world coordinate system, so you still need to orient the light source in Octane.
User avatar
face
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:10 pm
Location: Germany

Ah yes, thats right, sorry.
I has some different results with an animated light, but that was because the lightdisc has deflected the light.

face
Win10 Pro, Driver 378.78, Softimage 2015SP2 & Octane 3.05 RC1,
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
Post Reply

Return to “Works In Progress”