beeswax candle

Display your final art here...
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.


For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.

This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
jmfowler
Licensed Customer
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:27 am
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Contact:

sorry but I have to agree with Face about the smoke on your candle, there is too much detail in it for the size of the wick MEANING - the scale looks wrong.

It really seems like you have reacted very defensively on this point considering it was clearly a valid and constructive remark by Face.
Maya 2013 / W7 64bit / Intel i7 980 / 24GB / Gigabyte gtx 580 3GB + 2*EVGA gtx 680 4gb / MB Gigabyte X58A-UD3R / NZXT Phantom - white/black case
Maya 2013/W7 64bit/Intel i7 3820/16GB/ MB Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 /4*EVGA gtx 680 4gb/SSD 6Gb.s /CM HAF X case
User avatar
MEC4D
Licensed Customer
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 7:14 am
Location: NYC , USA

and as you read we cleared it out already , so not see point of going back to it again .. and as I said the density of the smoke is to low and should be more diffuse
and scale have here nothing to do , as resealing the smoke will not change anything the details will be still there as it is post work and not a model .
I would have to do it again but I am not going to do that as I really no care about it as this image is not important , next time would be better .
I hope for once someone see what is good also and not focus only on negative point as no one in this gallery do everything perfect and accurate
beside Face have good intentions but explain the way that could be misunderstand for something different in his first comments .. but hey we know everything we want to know case is closed image landed in garbage .. what else to talk about that I already don't know about ..life go forward

P.S I still like Face nothing less ..
Post Reply

Return to “M is for Metaverse Gallery”