Cinema4D version 2022.1.1-R6 (Obsolete stable) 08.07.2023

Sub forum for plugin releases

Moderators: ChrisHekman, aoktar

User avatar
SSmolak
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 pm
Location: Poland
Contact:

I don't remember if this was before but connecting 16-32 bit HDR image to color correction node cause that this image loses its bits depth. Jittered color correction and Image adjustments nodes works fine with HDR.
Architectural Visualizations http://www.archviz-4d.studio
User avatar
Kalua
Licensed Customer
Posts: 534
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2013 2:13 am
Location: Caribbean Sea
Contact:

SSmolak wrote:
Kalua wrote: Hi, SSmolak
Would you mind sharing the setup on how to make this "Field shape node" to work? Have been trying to make it work with no success.
Regards,
Hi, scene attached. You need to drag SDF object to Shape Input in Field Texture also link it in Transform Node too to match position.

If you use restart render in Octane LV - it will crash.
Yes. It crashes hen you reload he scene.
Other than tha if looks great.
THanks again for sharing!
C4D 2025.1.1 Octane 2025.2.1 v1.5.1, <<2 X 3090 + NVlink>>, Windows 10, X399, AMD TR 1950X, 128 GB RAM, NVIDIA SD 552.22
https://www.behance.net/PaperArchitect
User avatar
aoktar
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 16067
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:28 pm
Location: Türkiye
Contact:

Kalua wrote:
SSmolak wrote:
Kalua wrote: Hi, SSmolak
Would you mind sharing the setup on how to make this "Field shape node" to work? Have been trying to make it work with no success.
Regards,
Hi, scene attached. You need to drag SDF object to Shape Input in Field Texture also link it in Transform Node too to match position.

If you use restart render in Octane LV - it will crash.
Yes. It crashes hen you reload he scene.
Other than tha if looks great.
THanks again for sharing!
That's the why I didn't want to release it. But I done it because of several times that's asked. Some types of implementations like this are challenging.
Octane For Cinema 4D developer / 3d generalist

3930k / 16gb / 780ti + 1070/1080 / psu 1600w / numerous hw
frankmci
Licensed Customer
Posts: 917
Joined: Fri May 26, 2017 2:00 pm
Location: Washington DC

aoktar wrote: That's the why I didn't want to release it. But I done it because of several times that's asked. Some types of implementations like this are challenging.
We have a saying here, "Damned if you do, damned if you don't."
Regardless, we all appreciate your outstanding efforts, Ahmet.
Animation Technical Director - Washington DC
User avatar
thanulee
Licensed Customer
Posts: 712
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:00 pm

anklove wrote:Hello there! Any chance to solve this issue? If i have object with transparency inside of a VDB volume i can clearly see the mesh boundaries.
Is that a standalone thing? should i ask in their forum? thanks
Gpix
Licensed Customer
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:22 pm

It seems, that when I activate motion blur in the active camera, the perspective correction gets deactivated although it is still checked in the camera tag as on.

When you disable and enable motionblur again the perspective correction works as intended with motion blur shown in the Live Viewer.But as soon as you change something in the scene and it refreshes the perspective correction gets dropped again and I have to deactivate/activate the motion blur again to get also the perspective correction right. It's an okay-ish workaround for the live viewer preview.

But as soon as I send the final render to the picture viewer the motion blur is active but the perspective correction isn't anymore rendering all passes and beauty without perspective ocrrection, and I don't know how to workaround that issue when I want to got the final render with all the passes including Motion Blur and perspective correction. Can somebody check it if it is just me, or if that is an new occuring issue?

Thank you!
Gpix
Licensed Customer
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 12:22 pm

Update to the Motion Blur/Perspective Correction issue.

I discovered, that if I check "Disable Camera M.blur" in the Camera tag on, it behaves as it should. Perspective correction and Motion Blur working together and activating Motion Blur doesn't deactivate the perspective correction. But without "Disable Camera M.blur" ticked the perspective correction doesn't work, although it is activated.

Is that supposed to work like this?
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10399
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

thanulee wrote:
anklove wrote:Hello there! Any chance to solve this issue? If i have object with transparency inside of a VDB volume i can clearly see the mesh boundaries.
Is that a standalone thing? should i ask in their forum? thanks
Hi,
yes, it is Standalone/SDK related, but, have you tried to reduce the Volume step length value?
Volume step length = 4
Volume step length = 4
Volume step length = 1
Volume step length = 1
ciao,
Beppe
User avatar
thanulee
Licensed Customer
Posts: 712
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 11:00 pm

bepeg4d wrote:
thanulee wrote:
anklove wrote:Hello there! Any chance to solve this issue? If i have object with transparency inside of a VDB volume i can clearly see the mesh boundaries.
Is that a standalone thing? should i ask in their forum? thanks
Hi,
yes, it is Standalone/SDK related, but, have you tried to reduce the Volume step length value?
IMG_8392.jpeg
IMG_8391.jpeg
ciao,
Beppe
Hey Beppe,

Yes, thank you. Thing is render times increase no reason with lower voxel count. Would be great if this was solved in a different way. Cheers!
User avatar
bepeg4d
Octane Guru
Posts: 10399
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 6:02 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Yes, more precision = higher render time.
The fact is that OctaneRender can better handle cutout geometry then Alpha planes.

ciao,
Beppe
Post Reply

Return to “Releases”