Kepler test build [Obsolete]

A forum where development builds are posted for testing by the community.
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
Post Reply
Demious
Licensed Customer
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:21 pm

Elvissuperstar007 wrote:who bought the Kepler??
which graphics card faster than in octane, Nvidia 680 or 580?
I do not know what to buy ((

<-- This guy.

I purchased 2 (not thinking about the Kepler architecture change).

I tested with the new Kepler test build and was seeing somewhere in the range of ~3.5 ms raycasting with both cards enabled and in a fairly simple scene.

I promptly sold one of the cards for close to what I bought it for, shelved my other 680; - and put my 2X480's back in.

Can't speak for the 580 precisely, but atm (and from my experience) 680 is a poor choice for Octane. I was actually getting comparable performance from a single 460.

I should say though that the 680 is a great card aside from the GPU rendering issues. So if you're considering purchasing it for game play/development, it's great. Like many have said already; avoid buying it exclusively for GPU rendering at the moment. I took a bit of a risk and bought mine within the first week of release: Lesson learned.
Intel i7 860 @ 2.8GHz, 8.00 GB, GeForce GTX 480 (x2), Windows 7 (64) {+2 shelved 680's waiting for Kepler support ;)}
User avatar
Elvissuperstar007
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 8:20 am
Location: Ukraine/Russia
Contact:

Demious wrote:
Elvissuperstar007 wrote:who bought the Kepler??
which graphics card faster than in octane, Nvidia 680 or 580?
I do not know what to buy ((

<-- This guy.

I purchased 2 (not thinking about the Kepler architecture change).

I tested with the new Kepler test build and was seeing somewhere in the range of ~3.5 ms raycasting with both cards enabled and in a fairly simple scene.

I promptly sold one of the cards for close to what I bought it for, shelved my other 680; - and put my 2X480's back in.

Can't speak for the 580 precisely, but atm (and from my experience) 680 is a poor choice for Octane. I was actually getting comparable performance from a single 460.

I should say though that the 680 is a great card aside from the GPU rendering issues. So if you're considering purchasing it for game play/development, it's great. Like many have said already; avoid buying it exclusively for GPU rendering at the moment. I took a bit of a risk and bought mine within the first week of release: Lesson learned.
but it does not work on octane to CUDA 4.2
680 can then be quickly
win 7 /64x C2Quad 6600 2.4/ Nvidia 9800 GX2 1gb 512 bit + Asus 480 GTX/ DDR2 8Gb / NVIDIA 460 GTX 2GB/2x NVIDIA 580 GTX 3GB
Page octane render " В Контакте " http://vkontakte.ru/club17913093
Dom74
Licensed Customer
Posts: 155
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 7:16 pm

maybe some progress here :
http://randomcontrol.com/blog/?p=284
Win7 x64 - 3DSMAX 2019 - 32GB RAM - 1080 TI
User avatar
marcio_max
Licensed Customer
Posts: 132
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:17 pm
Location: Aracatuba/SP/Brazil

Oh my God!
I'm dreaming? GTX 690 with 3072 Cuda Cores?
Please, Octane Team, does something!

http://www.evga.com/articles/00679/#GTX690
Attachments
gtx690.JPG
| Windows 8 Pro x64 | Octane for 3ds Max/Standalone | i7 860 | 12GB RAM | 1x EVGA GTX 670 4GB / 2x EVGA GTX 670 2GB | Cooler Master HAF 932 |
Chris_TC
Licensed Customer
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:38 am

marcio_max wrote:Oh my God!
I'm dreaming? GTX 690 with 3072 Cuda Cores?
Please, Octane Team, does something!
It's slower than the 590. Nvidia REALLY wants us to buy the pro cards I guess :(
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5805/nvid ... ra-fast/15
User avatar
justix
Licensed Customer
Posts: 585
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:01 pm

Chris_TC wrote:
marcio_max wrote:Oh my God!
I'm dreaming? GTX 690 with 3072 Cuda Cores?
Please, Octane Team, does something!
It's slower than the 590. Nvidia REALLY wants us to buy the pro cards I guess :(
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5805/nvid ... ra-fast/15
Such as?
Win 7 64 | 2 X MSI AERO GtX 1070| Intel I7-6850K| 32 GB DDR4 RAM | Asus X99 II-A
User avatar
mbetke
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1293
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:12 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Yes Nvidia thinks they will sale more Kepler GPGPUs like any other before.
"Glimps" found it on Twitter. They really must see all the potential there. I really will think of what I will do then.
PURE3D Visualisierungen
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
User avatar
glimpse
Licensed Customer
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 2:17 pm
Contact:

Guys, don't buy any 6xx cards yet..

It's probably no secret that nVidia loses a lot of money providing good computational power in gtx cards for PRO users and their needs..the scene is changing - they are shifting their products by cropping some of potential from gaming cards in order to sell more Q&T products - yes, they perform better on games, but not for gpgpu, check this out:

"NVIDIA expects to sell more Kepler-based Tesla GPGPU boards than it had sold all of the previous generations of Teslas combined." Source 7bil transistor Kepler is on it's way (on may14) - let's wait a week and look what they are going to bring..
Daniel
Licensed Customer
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:52 am

If Teslas will be the only way to go, I'd better start saving up...
Core i7 950 @3.07GHz | GTX 460 2GB | 12GB RAM | Window 7 x64
User avatar
mbetke
Licensed Customer
Posts: 1293
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:12 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

I will observer and maybe change to ATI and another render engine. I would love to stay with Octane but the costs are very heavy and to much for my taste if I get a 4 or 6GB Pro board.
PURE3D Visualisierungen
Sys: Intel Core i9-12900K, 128GB RAM, 2x 4090 RTX, Windows 11 Pro x64, 3ds Max 2024.2
Post Reply

Return to “Development Build Releases”