Please share the link, a 460 for $109 is pretty great deal.
You don't want to use SLI, it slows down Octane unfortunately. But Octane will use multiple cards separately.
Gtx 470/480 - 2.4 pre beta speed
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
Boy, maybe I should sell my 460 2GB and get a 470...same price, and from the benchmark above, looks to be 50% faster, though with 720MB less memory...t0m4sk0 wrote:RESULT: CUDA 3.2 only showing another 112 cores, but only showing, this architecture cannot us all 3 blocks in this version octane, maybe radiance will find out how to do it
Mac OS X 10.8.0 | ASUS GTX 580 1.5GB | MSI GTX 470 | ATI Radeon 6870 | Core i7 2.9Ghz | 16GB
Thanks for the info.
Win 11 64GB | NVIDIA RTX3060 12GB
yes, it is really good idea, but maybe for someone is big memory more important.colorlabs wrote:Boy, maybe I should sell my 460 2GB and get a 470...same price, and from the benchmark above, looks to be 50% faster, though with 720MB less memory...t0m4sk0 wrote:RESULT: CUDA 3.2 only showing another 112 cores, but only showing, this architecture cannot us all 3 blocks in this version octane, maybe radiance will find out how to do it
exterior = more memory, less power needed
interior = more power, less memory needed
1 x GTX 460 2GB, Core i3 @ 3,7Ghz, 4GB Ram, Win 7 64-bit, 260.99 WHQL