1150*720 1600samples 7min
1920*1080 600samples 4m59s
2300*1500 256samples 3m50s
is this common?
render time
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
the higher the resolution, the more one pixelsample is worth,
eg rendering at 4x resolution requires processing 4x more pixels, so the larger image will have the same noise (if downscaled to original size) with only 4x the amount of pixel samples.
Radiance
eg rendering at 4x resolution requires processing 4x more pixels, so the larger image will have the same noise (if downscaled to original size) with only 4x the amount of pixel samples.
Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
thanks for your comment
i agree with the niose
but higher resolution could get much better detail in short time
`By the way, did you check the email our boss sent you a few months ago. He did not get any reply.
We want to develop a plug-in for Marvelous Designer. And also wish to resell Octane in Korea.` (do you rember this?
)
please mail us
[email protected]
thanks
i agree with the niose
but higher resolution could get much better detail in short time
`By the way, did you check the email our boss sent you a few months ago. He did not get any reply.
We want to develop a plug-in for Marvelous Designer. And also wish to resell Octane in Korea.` (do you rember this?
)please mail us
[email protected]
thanks