Possible bug: Cant find all my Cuda cores?

A forum where development builds are posted for testing by the community.
Forum rules
NOTE: The software in this forum is not %100 reliable, they are development builds and are meant for testing by experienced octane users. If you are a new octane user, we recommend to use the current stable release from the 'Commercial Product News & Releases' forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
pckmark
Licensed Customer
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:50 am

Hey :) Hmm, is this the right place to report bugs?

I am using the 260.19 Nvidia driver (not developer driver), and the cuda toolkit 3.0.

No matter what version i use, Octane only finds 125 cores, and i am pretty sure that i were supposed to have access to 192 of them.

http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-ge ... 50-us.html <--- gts 450 page
Attachments
bug.jpg
Sidux X86_64 - 450 GTS "golden sample" - 4 GB Ram - Intel Core 2 Quad 2.33 GhZ - 1 TB Sata drive
User avatar
pckmark
Licensed Customer
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:50 am

btw, it is a gainward "golden sample", so it is clocked a bit higher than on the nvidia page.
Sidux X86_64 - 450 GTS "golden sample" - 4 GB Ram - Intel Core 2 Quad 2.33 GhZ - 1 TB Sata drive
User avatar
Lutze
Licensed Customer
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 6:02 pm

pckmark wrote:Hey :) Hmm, is this the right place to report bugs?

I am using the 260.19 Nvidia driver (not developer driver), and the cuda toolkit 3.0.

No matter what version i use, Octane only finds 125 cores, and i am pretty sure that i were supposed to have access to 192 of them.

http://www.nvidia.com/object/product-ge ... 50-us.html <--- gts 450 page
Is is the same with me. 3.0 Developper Drivers and Toolkit with my Quadro 2000 (192 cores) and only 125 are seen and used by octane. I believe the Quadro 2000 and GTX 450 are the same cards under the hood.

Very strange...

Lutze
_________________
System: AMD X4, 2x GTX470, 8GB Ram, Win7-64Bit
User avatar
face
Octane Plugin Developer
Posts: 3204
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:10 pm
Location: Germany

Maybe thats the cuda bug.
With the release of Octane v6 with cuda 3.2 it should be ok...

face
Win10 Pro, Driver 378.78, Softimage 2015SP2 & Octane 3.05 RC1,
64GB Ram, i7-6950X, GTX1080TI 11GB
http://vimeo.com/user2509578
User avatar
matej
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:54 pm
Location: Slovenia

I think that 450 is based on the same chip as 460 (GF 104), so it suffers from the same problem as 460 - ie. only 2/3 of cores are currently usable.

We will have to wait for Octane with CUDA 3.2, which will address this.
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
User avatar
pckmark
Licensed Customer
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:50 am

Never knew these cards were this close, very interesting card you have though. Never really read up on what makes the quadro cards different.

Thanks for the info everyone, now i am calmer :) Thought maybe something was wrong with this card. It does really get punished sometimes! :lol:
Sidux X86_64 - 450 GTS "golden sample" - 4 GB Ram - Intel Core 2 Quad 2.33 GhZ - 1 TB Sata drive
User avatar
radiance
Posts: 7633
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 2:33 pm

The next 5b release will use cuda 3.2 and support GF104 chips's 1/3rd missing cores.

Radiance
Win 7 x64 & ubuntu | 2x GTX480 | Quad 2.66GHz | 8GB
User avatar
matej
Licensed Customer
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:54 pm
Location: Slovenia

ho! ho! ho! :mrgreen:
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
User avatar
pckmark
Licensed Customer
Posts: 42
Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:50 am

Oh, very glad to hear that! I know its probably not much, but still i am very anxious too see how much faster octane gets for me in the next version.

So, Thanks :)

-Mark
Sidux X86_64 - 450 GTS "golden sample" - 4 GB Ram - Intel Core 2 Quad 2.33 GhZ - 1 TB Sata drive
Post Reply

Return to “Development Build Releases”