Hello to Everyone.
We wanted to find out if you guys can "see" as good as you Render.
We have 4 option here.
a)Real.
b)Real but altered a little bit in order to confuse you.
c)Cgi.
d)Cgi but altered a little bit in order to confuse you.
Think and "see" twice before you answer.
Thank you all.
Ohh and if you cant vote you can always leave a comment....
Real or CGI???
Forum rules
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
Important notice: All artwork submitted on our public gallery forums gallery forums may or may not be used by OTOY for publication on our website gallery.
If you do not want us to publish your art, please mention it in your post clearly. (put a very red small diagonal cross in the top left corner of the image)
Any images already published on the gallery will be removed if the original author asks us to do so.
We recommend placing your credits on the images so you benefit from the exposure too, and use a minimum image width of 1200 pixels, and pathtracing or PMC. Thanks for your attention, The OctaneRender Team.
For new users: this forum is moderated. Your first post will appear only after it has been reviewed by a moderator, so it will not show up immediately.
This is necessary to avoid this forum being flooded by spam.
- Attachments
-
- Real Or CGI?
Apparently polls don't work.
I don't get the last option. I suppose that it means that the render was so realistically awesome, that you had to worsen it in Photoshop? But what would be the point of this? If you produce a realistic result, you want people to believe that is a real photo, not to trick them into correctly guessing (by wrong reasons) that the image is a render.
A studio shot is artificial by definition = easier to reproduce with computers, so this render could be anything. Also the image could be bigger. But I will still says CGI.
A better test (for Octane) would be to have a non-retouched original photo of a scene with complex lighting, and a render. So a photo vs CGI option.
I don't get the last option. I suppose that it means that the render was so realistically awesome, that you had to worsen it in Photoshop? But what would be the point of this? If you produce a realistic result, you want people to believe that is a real photo, not to trick them into correctly guessing (by wrong reasons) that the image is a render.
A studio shot is artificial by definition = easier to reproduce with computers, so this render could be anything. Also the image could be bigger. But I will still says CGI.
A better test (for Octane) would be to have a non-retouched original photo of a scene with complex lighting, and a render. So a photo vs CGI option.
SW: Octane 3.05 | Linux Mint 18.1 64bit | Blender 2.78 HW: EVGA GTX 1070 | i5 2500K | 16GB RAM Drivers: 375.26
cgmo.net
cgmo.net
I think it's CGI. The reflection in the phone appears to have people standing around in it and are appearing in all different places and angles. The most visible person appears to be looking at the phone front on, which would suggest that the actual phone is mounted on a wall and is not lying flat.
I think I can also see a lone firefly in the shadow of the one on the right at the bottom left.
It may be my eyes playing tricks on me, but I think on the phone on the right I can see some sharp edges on the top left and bottom right corners as a result of too low subdivision.
I think I can also see a lone firefly in the shadow of the one on the right at the bottom left.
It may be my eyes playing tricks on me, but I think on the phone on the right I can see some sharp edges on the top left and bottom right corners as a result of too low subdivision.
Core i7 950 @3.07GHz | GTX 460 2GB | 12GB RAM | Window 7 x64
To matej
-Cgi but altered a little bit in order to confuse you- means that we reprodused a pure (not retouched) photoreal render and added only 1 thing to trick you.
But generally you got a point at your writings.Thank you.
To Daniel
You got the only one firefly man, congrats.
To steveps3
The person from our stuff who choose the picture with iOS is sooooo FIRED.... Joking..., nice "see" by the way steveps3
Yeap its pure CGI, octane pure render with out any colour correction, or anything and it was rendered under 6 minutes.
Preety cool ha??
-Cgi but altered a little bit in order to confuse you- means that we reprodused a pure (not retouched) photoreal render and added only 1 thing to trick you.
But generally you got a point at your writings.Thank you.
To Daniel
You got the only one firefly man, congrats.
To steveps3
The person from our stuff who choose the picture with iOS is sooooo FIRED.... Joking..., nice "see" by the way steveps3
Yeap its pure CGI, octane pure render with out any colour correction, or anything and it was rendered under 6 minutes.
Preety cool ha??
To ttaberna
Its some kind of weird reflection, but do to the untouched of the story we left it there.
ReRendered the scene with a little bit differend setting.
Think this is better.
Its some kind of weird reflection, but do to the untouched of the story we left it there.
ReRendered the scene with a little bit differend setting.
Think this is better.
- Attachments
-
- Rerendered pure octane render.