OctaneRender® pre-Beta 2.3 v4 (win/lin/mac) [OBSOLETE]

[pixelrush]

another older issue:

there is something strange about the way the index and filmindex sliders slide in glossy and specular.

try it! they both seem to jump back/trail behind the mouse - about 15mm on my screen

[radiance]

another older issue:

there is something strange about the way the index and filmindex sliders slide in glossy and specular.

try it! they both seem to jump back/trail behind the mouse - about 15mm on my screen

yeah, they're probably on logarithmic scale, if you switch them to linear it should be gone,
it's a slight cosmetic issue, on the list already.

Radiance

[pixelrush]

yeah its only log and for these cases I think - at least I take the time to report them

[radiance]

i'm very happy no serious bug has been reported yet

Radiance

[8Eggar8]

No Final Render, but what it looks like after 15mins
28 Light sources - Not bad

[radiance]

what about the poor performance of the emitters under the ACTION NEWS ?
inverted normals ?

Radiance

[franbec]

Agree, fab. job. Much better now,no crashes,working nice at the firsts test. ( win 7 64).

[8Eggar8]

what about the poor performance of the emitters under the ACTION NEWS ?
inverted normals ?

Radiance

Rhino Survey Says 'No'

[8Eggar8]

Although, you can see, I tied a bunch of mesh's together that would have similar properties (but only show as 1 material node in Octane) by joining them as 1 object. Perhaps this could have had some bearing?

[8Eggar8]

In Fact, It looks like I joined all 'non image based' lighting (I guess Studio Lights) Together on this test. But all arrows are pointing how they should be (representative of Normals)