ATI / CPU compatibility - When?

Generic forum to discuss Octane Render, post ideas and suggest improvements.
Forum rules
Please add your OS and Hardware Configuration in your signature, it makes it easier for us to help you analyze problems. Example: Win 7 64 | Geforce GTX680 | i7 3770 | 16GB
Post Reply
User avatar (Default)
azims
Licensed Customer
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:55 am

Can you update us on any progress on the headless rendering?

Thanks,
Top
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Contact:
Contact Goldorak

Probably 3.08, but if it gets done before June it could make it in 3.07
Top
User avatar (Default)
azims
Licensed Customer
Posts: 93
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 5:55 am

Thanks,
Top
User avatar (Default)
Timmaigh!
Licensed Customer
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2010 9:10 am

Goldorak wrote:Probably 3.08, but if it gets done before June it could make it in 3.07
Can you provide any info on expected performance? I mean, does OpenCL version on AMD GPU run comparably to CUDA version on Nvidia, or is it faster/slower/different? I mean significantly different, 10 percent difference either way does not matter.

Would rather not buy GTX 1080Ti now. only to find out its 3X faster on AMD Vega and OpenCL 3 months from now :D
R9 7950x, 64GB DDR5 6000 MHz, 2x RTX 4090, Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, Kingston KC3000 2TB, Kingston KC3000 1TB, WD Caviar Gold 6TB, Win11 Pro 64bit
Top
User avatar (Default)
Iceman9
Licensed Customer
Posts: 217
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 1:22 am

Timmaigh! wrote:Would rather not buy GTX 1080Ti now. only to find out its 3X faster on AMD Vega and OpenCL 3 months from now :D
The odds on that are somewhere between 0 and .00001.

:D
Top
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Contact:
Contact Goldorak

Any early AMD support is going to be unoptimized. It will be a lot of work to make it performant, and we can't really start in that until we know user stability and deployment is solid. It's at least as much work as our time spent on Pascal tuning.
Top
User avatar (Default)
roberthpaige
Licensed Customer
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:21 pm

Goldorak wrote:Any early AMD support is going to be unoptimized. It will be a lot of work to make it performant, and we can't really start in that until we know user stability and deployment is solid. It's at least as much work as our time spent on Pascal tuning.
You guys are doing amazing! Keep it up.
Let me know how I can help.
Top
User avatar (Default)
roberthpaige
Licensed Customer
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:21 pm

Any update?
Top
User avatar (Default)
roberthpaige
Licensed Customer
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2015 2:21 pm

Goldorak wrote:Any early AMD support is going to be unoptimized. It will be a lot of work to make it performant, and we can't really start in that until we know user stability and deployment is solid. It's at least as much work as our time spent on Pascal tuning.
Any update?
Top
User avatar
Goldorak
OctaneRender Team
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:09 pm
Contact:
Contact Goldorak

roberthpaige wrote:
Goldorak wrote:Any early AMD support is going to be unoptimized. It will be a lot of work to make it performant, and we can't really start in that until we know user stability and deployment is solid. It's at least as much work as our time spent on Pascal tuning.
Any update?
https://twitter.com/OTOY/status/940818345770831873
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”