It looks like the gamma output is different on the Info passes in this version than it was on 3.04.5. Just sayin'.
Same file opened in the new version. Just turned adaptive sampling on.
Version 3.06-TEST-3.1 (WORK IN PROGRESS BUILDS)
Moderators: ChrisHekman, aoktar
Hi,
Noise pass activated by default when AS workin , is very handy thanks
.
Noise pass activated by default when AS workin , is very handy thanks

:::::::::::::::::
pxlntwrk.net
pxlntwrk.net
Hi Hatsize7,
about differences in info passes, yes correct, look at this post by Abstrax in another discussion:
viewtopic.php?f=36&t=60028&start=12#p307304
ciao beppe
about differences in info passes, yes correct, look at this post by Abstrax in another discussion:
viewtopic.php?f=36&t=60028&start=12#p307304
ciao beppe
I actually like this change. Info passes gamma always felt wrong to me prior to this. Now I know why.bepeg4d wrote:Hi Hatsize7,
about differences in info passes, yes correct, look at this post by Abstrax in another discussion:
viewtopic.php?f=36&t=60028&start=12#p307304
ciao beppe
- mitch.scott
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2016 4:14 am
I seem to be unable to get the subscription version of 3.06-Test-3 to activate. It is almost like it is the regular Octane plugin and not the Octane VR plugin.
Looks like Adaptive Sampling doesn't work with TEST3 (Standalon updated too) or working way slower
PT 1920x1080
Max samples: 3000
With AS: Max 3000, min 1000, Noise threshold 0.03, adaptive strength 1, group pixels 2x2
http://i.imgur.com/uvt3zxR.png - AS 6:41 (TEST-2)
http://i.imgur.com/TfgaOeM.jpg - AS 10:56 (TEST-3)
http://i.imgur.com/svwTKDo.jpg - noAS 11:04 (TEST-3)
Reinstalling plugin and octane standalon, when installing TEST3 both - same result, looks like AS in TEST3 slower then TEST2
UPD.
I compared all this pictures and TEST3 AS picture are less noisy then TEST2, very close to picture with noAS. Looks like something changed with Noise threshold. Same values, but different results. And different render time
UPD2. Looks like something changed. Any explain please?
TEST2 3000, AS min 1000, Noise threshold 0.02 = 7 min
TEST3 3000, AS min 256, Noise threshold 0.02 = 9:30, but less noise at final image.
PT 1920x1080
Max samples: 3000
With AS: Max 3000, min 1000, Noise threshold 0.03, adaptive strength 1, group pixels 2x2
http://i.imgur.com/uvt3zxR.png - AS 6:41 (TEST-2)
http://i.imgur.com/TfgaOeM.jpg - AS 10:56 (TEST-3)
http://i.imgur.com/svwTKDo.jpg - noAS 11:04 (TEST-3)
Reinstalling plugin and octane standalon, when installing TEST3 both - same result, looks like AS in TEST3 slower then TEST2
UPD.
I compared all this pictures and TEST3 AS picture are less noisy then TEST2, very close to picture with noAS. Looks like something changed with Noise threshold. Same values, but different results. And different render time
UPD2. Looks like something changed. Any explain please?
TEST2 3000, AS min 1000, Noise threshold 0.02 = 7 min
TEST3 3000, AS min 256, Noise threshold 0.02 = 9:30, but less noise at final image.
Last edited by Cheiser on Sat Mar 11, 2017 11:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Have you checked noise pass while rendering for process? Also watch render speed changes. It should be accelerated when green areas grow up.Cheiser wrote:Looks like Adaptive Sampling doesn't work with TEST3 (Standalon updated too) or working way slower
PT 1920x1080
Max samples: 3000
With AS: Max 3000, min 1000, Noise threshold 0.03, adaptive strength 1, group pixels 2x2
http://i.imgur.com/uvt3zxR.png - AS 6:41 (TEST-2)
http://i.imgur.com/TfgaOeM.jpg - AS 10:56 (TEST-3)
http://i.imgur.com/svwTKDo.jpg - noAS 11:04 (TEST-3)
Reinstalling plugin and octane standalon, when installing TEST3 both - same result, looks like AS in TEST3 slower then TEST2
UPD.
I compared all this pictures and TEST3 AS picture are less noisy then TEST2, very close to picture with noAS. Looks like something changed with Noise threshold. Same values, but different results. And different render time
Octane For Cinema 4D developer / 3d generalist
3930k / 16gb / 780ti + 1070/1080 / psu 1600w / numerous hw
3930k / 16gb / 780ti + 1070/1080 / psu 1600w / numerous hw
Why at same scene, same frame and same settings TEST2 and TEST3 have different results at Noise (TEST3 less) and render time (TEST3 twise slower)? Something changed with AS?aoktar wrote:Have you checked noise pass while rendering for process? Also watch render speed changes. It should be accelerated when green areas grow up.Cheiser wrote:Looks like Adaptive Sampling doesn't work with TEST3 (Standalon updated too) or working way slower
PT 1920x1080
Max samples: 3000
With AS: Max 3000, min 1000, Noise threshold 0.03, adaptive strength 1, group pixels 2x2
http://i.imgur.com/uvt3zxR.png - AS 6:41 (TEST-2)
http://i.imgur.com/TfgaOeM.jpg - AS 10:56 (TEST-3)
http://i.imgur.com/svwTKDo.jpg - noAS 11:04 (TEST-3)
Reinstalling plugin and octane standalon, when installing TEST3 both - same result, looks like AS in TEST3 slower then TEST2
UPD.
I compared all this pictures and TEST3 AS picture are less noisy then TEST2, very close to picture with noAS. Looks like something changed with Noise threshold. Same values, but different results. And different render time
Installed TEST2 again.
Why TEST3 noise pass grey out? Its ok?
https://monosnap.com/file/ORGR4ZPJuUmPO ... GQQdnn2JSI
Also is there any way to render Noise as pass, not just to see it in Live viewer? I checked it in Octane settings, but it wont render it as pass in Picture Viewer
Why TEST3 noise pass grey out? Its ok?
https://monosnap.com/file/ORGR4ZPJuUmPO ... GQQdnn2JSI
Also is there any way to render Noise as pass, not just to see it in Live viewer? I checked it in Octane settings, but it wont render it as pass in Picture Viewer
Second attempt. Same scene, same settings.
PT
Max 3000
Min 2
Threshold 0.03
TEST2 = 6:38
http://i.imgur.com/W1BO18w.png
TEST3 = 5:14
http://i.imgur.com/uLQ989T.jpg
Confused. Now TEST3 faster.
But again more noise in TEST3 compare to TEST2 and artifacts (black dots)
https://monosnap.com/file/aatZzFD9mG9FK ... Y2YUIlmfqM - noise (TEST 2 left side)
https://monosnap.com/file/lRPdAjQgCISVO ... IMz7orK3Ir - artefacts
PT
Max 3000
Min 2
Threshold 0.03
TEST2 = 6:38
http://i.imgur.com/W1BO18w.png
TEST3 = 5:14
http://i.imgur.com/uLQ989T.jpg
Confused. Now TEST3 faster.
But again more noise in TEST3 compare to TEST2 and artifacts (black dots)
https://monosnap.com/file/aatZzFD9mG9FK ... Y2YUIlmfqM - noise (TEST 2 left side)
https://monosnap.com/file/lRPdAjQgCISVO ... IMz7orK3Ir - artefacts
Last edited by Cheiser on Sat Mar 11, 2017 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.